ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2020
Copy number variations associated with fetal congenital kidney malformations.
Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unilateral Renal Agenesis: Prenatal Diagnosis and Postnatal Issues.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Review of genetic testing in kidney disease patients: Diagnostic yield of single nucleotide variants and copy number variations evaluated across and within kidney phenotype groups.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022Review
- Disease mechanisms of monogenic congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022Review
- Parental mosaicism for apparent de novo genetic variants: Scope, detection, and counseling challenges.Prenatal diagnosis · 2022Review
- Multidisciplinary approaches for elucidating genetics and molecular pathogenesis of urinary tract malformations.Kidney international · 2022Review
- Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Clinical Utility and the Yield of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array in Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Central Nervous System Abnormalities.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Classifying and Evaluating Fetuses With Ventriculomegaly in Genetic Etiologic Studies.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) constitute 20-30% of all congenital malformations. Within the CAKUT phenotypic spectrum, renal hypodysplasia (RHD) is particularly severe. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array test in prenatal diagnosis of RHD for improving prenatal genetic counseling and to search for evidence of a possible causative role of copy-number variations (CNVs) in RHD.
resultsWe performed a systematic survey of CNV burden in 120 fetuses with RHD: 103 cases were isolated RHD and 17 were non-isolated RHD. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array test was performed using the Affymetrix CytoScan HD platform. All annotated CNVs were validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. We identified abnormal CNVs in 15 (12.5%) cases of RHD; of these CNVs, 11 were pathogenic and 4 were variants of uncertain significance. The detection rate of abnormal CNVs in non-isolated RHD was higher (29.4%, 5/17) than that in isolated RHD (9.7%, 10/103) (
conclusionsThe variable phenotypes that abnormal CNVs may cause indicate the genetic counseling is needed for RHD cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.