ArticleEvolutionary applications2020
The role of windows of selection and windows of dominance in the evolution of insecticide resistance in human disease vectors.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary and epidemiological considerations for anthelmintic treatments in ruminant livestock.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Knockdown Resistance: Genotypic and Phenotypic Insights IntoEvolutionary applications · 2026Article
- The β-triketone, nitisinone, kills insecticide-resistant mosquitoes through cuticular uptake.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- A proof-of-concept experimental-theoretical model to predict pesticide resistance evolution.Heredity · 2025Article
- Simulating dynamic insecticide selection pressures for resistance management in mosquitoes assuming polygenic resistance.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Impact of Aedes aegypti V1016I and F1534C knockdown resistance genotypes on operational interventions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The impact of insecticide decay on the rate of insecticide resistance evolution for monotherapies and mixtures.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Biological lessons for strategic resistance management.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Beyond redundant kill: A fundamental explanation of how insecticide mixtures work for resistance management.Pest management science · 2023Review
- Current Status of Mosquito Handling, Transporting and Releasing in Frame of the Sterile Insect Technique.Insects · 2022Review
- Enhancing the Quality of Spray Application in IRS: Evaluation of the Micron Track Sprayer.Insects · 2022Article
- Modelling new insecticide-treated bed nets for malaria-vector control: how to strategically manage resistance?Malaria journal · 2022Article
- Household modifications after the indoor residual spraying (IRS) campaign in Mozambique reduce the actual spray coverage and efficacy.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Review
- Dicyclanil resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina, substantially reduces flystrike protection by dicyclanil and cyromazine based products.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2020Article
- The role of windows of selection and windows of dominance in the evolution of insecticide resistance in human disease vectors.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Persistent insecticides sprayed onto house walls, and incorporated into insecticide-treated bednets, provide long-acting, cost-effective control of vector-borne diseases such as malaria and leishmaniasis. The high concentrations that occur immediately postdeployment may kill both resistant and susceptible insects. However, insecticide concentration, and therefore killing ability, declines in the months after deployment. As concentrations decline, resistant insects start to survive, while susceptible insects are still killed. The period of time after deployment, within which the mortality of resistant individuals is lower than that of susceptible ones, has been termed the "window of selection" in other contexts. It is recognized as driving resistance in bacteria and malaria parasites, both of which are predominantly haploid. We argue that paying more attention to these mortality differences can help understand the evolution of insecticide resistance. Because insects are diploid, resistance encoded by single genes generates heterozygotes. This gives the potential for a narrower "window of dominance," within the window of selection, where heterozygote mortality is lower than that of susceptible homozygotes. We explore the general properties of windows of selection and dominance in driving resistance. We quantify their likely effect using data from new laboratory experiments and published data from the laboratory and field. These windows can persist months or years after insecticide deployments. Differential mortalities of resistant, susceptible and heterozygous genotypes, after public health deployments, constitute a major challenge to controlling resistance. Greater attention to mortality differences by genotype would inform strategies to reduce the evolution of resistance to existing and new insecticides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.