ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020
Evaluating Structural Variation Detection Tools for Long-Read Sequencing Datasets in
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Genomics of Transisthmian Damselfishes (Abudefduf saxatilis and A. troschelii).Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Challenges in the detection and assembly of virus integration structures in human genomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Systematic benchmarking of tools for structural variation detection using short- and long-read sequencing data in pigs.iScience · 2025Article
- TMBstable: a variant caller controls performance variation across heterogeneous sequencing samples.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A graph clustering algorithm for detection and genotyping of structural variants from long reads.GigaScience · 2024Article
- A survey of algorithms for the detection of genomic structural variants from long-read sequencing data.Nature methods · 2023Review
- De Novo Structural Variations of Escherichia coli Detected by Nanopore Long-Read Sequencing.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Best Practices in Microbial Experimental Evolution: Using Reporters and Long-Read Sequencing to Identify Copy Number Variation in Experimental Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Review
- Long-Read Sequencing in Blood Group Genetics.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023Review
- Robust Benchmark Structural Variant Calls of An Asian Using State-of-the-art Long-read Sequencing Technologies.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Is an SV caller compatible with sequencing data? An online recommendation tool to automatically recommend the optimal caller based on data features.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Comprehensive analysis of structural variants in chickens using PacBio sequencing.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- A Practical Guide for Structural Variation Detection in the Human Genome.Current protocols in human genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural variation (SV) represents a major form of genetic variations that contribute to polymorphic variations, human diseases, and phenotypes in many organisms. Long-read sequencing has been successfully used to identify novel and complex SVs. However, comparison of SV detection tools for long-read sequencing datasets has not been reported. Therefore, we developed an analysis workflow that combined two alignment tools (NGMLR and minimap2) and five callers (Sniffles, Picky, smartie-sv, PBHoney, and NanoSV) to evaluate the SV detection in six datasets of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.