ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020
Rapid Recognition of Field-Grown Wheat Spikes Based on a Superpixel Segmentation Algorithm Using Digital Images.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on automatic detection of wheat spike grain number based on deep learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A lightweight wheat ear counting model in UAV images based on improved YOLOv8.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Feature diffusion reconstruction mechanism network for crop spike head detection.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Winter wheat ear counting based on improved YOLOv7x and Kalman filter tracking algorithm with video streaming.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Semi-Self-Supervised Learning for Semantic Segmentation in Images with Dense Patterns.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Overlapped tobacco shred image segmentation and area computation using an improved Mask RCNN network and COT algorithm.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Deep-agriNet: a lightweight attention-based encoder-decoder framework for crop identification using multispectral images.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- SlypNet: Spikelet-based yield prediction of wheat using advanced plant phenotyping and computer vision techniques.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Wheat Ear Segmentation Based on a Multisensor System and Superpixel Classification.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Wheat-Net: An Automatic Dense Wheat Spike Segmentation Method Based on an Optimized Hybrid Task Cascade Model.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Towards Automated Analysis of Grain Spikes in Greenhouse Images Using Neural Network Approaches: A Comparative Investigation of Six Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An image segmentation technique with statistical strategies for pesticide efficacy assessment.PloS one · 2021Article
- Deep Segmentation of Point Clouds of Wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Coffee Flower Identification Using Binarization Algorithm Based on Convolutional Neural Network for Digital Images.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wheat spike number, which could be rapidly and accurately estimated by the image processing technology, serves as the basis for crop growth monitoring and yield prediction. In this research, simple linear iterative clustering (SLIC) was performed for superpixel segmentation of the digital images of field-grown wheat. Firstly, certain characteristic color parameters were extracted and analyzed from the digital images, and the classifiers with the highest accuracy were chosen for subsequent image classification. Next, the main body of wheat spike was extracted through a series of morphological transformation and estimate was performed for each region. Backbone of the head was extracted, and the number of inflection points of backbone was detected. Then the wheat spike number was determined by combining the estimate of inflection points of backbone and the estimate for each region. Finally, the wheat spike number estimate was verified under four nitrogen fertilizer levels. The results were as follows: (1) Super green value (Eg) and normalized red green index (Dgr) were used as classification features to recognize wheat spikes, soil and leaves; (2) compared with pixel-based image processing, wheat spike recognition effect was much better after superpixel segmentation, as the main body of wheat spike extracted was more clear and morphology more intact; and (3) wheat plants had better growth under high nitrogen fertilizer level, and the accuracy of wheat spike number estimation was also the highest, which was 94.01%. The growth status was the worst under no nitrogen fertilizer application, and the accuracy of wheat spikes number estimation was also the lowest, which was only 80.8%. After excluding the no nitrogen condition, the accuracy of wheat spikes number estimation among mixed samples with more uniform growth status was up to 93.8%, which was an increase by 10.1% than before the exclusion. Wheat spikes number estimate based on superpixel segmentation and color features was a rapid and accurate method that was applicable to the field environment. However, this method was not recommended for use when the growth status of wheat was poor or of high heterogeneity. The findings provided reference for field-grown wheat yield estimate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.