ArticleCancer management and research2020
Metabolically Abnormal Obesity Increases the Risk of Advanced Prostate Cancer in Chinese Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic Phenotypes and the Risk of Cancer Occurrence: A Prospective Cohort Study with 18-Year Follow-up.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
- Associations between metabolic obesity phenotypes and prostate cancer in the U.S. population: a cross-sectional study.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- PMHeliyon · 2024Article
- Metabolic obesity phenotypes and obesity-related cancer risk in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2023Article
- Effect of obesity on the prognosis and recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the pathological risk of prostate cancer (PCa) according to the obesity and metabolic status of Chinese patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of 1016 patients with PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy and whose metabolic status and body mass index were examined. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between different metabolic obesity phenotypes and the pathological outcomes of PCa.
resultsAmong 1016 men, 551 (54.2%), 106 (10.4%), 238 (23.4%), and 121 (11.9%) were assigned to the metabolically healthy and normal weight (MHNW) group, metabolically abnormal but normal weight (MANW) group, metabolically healthy but overweight or obese (MHO) group, and metabolically abnormal and overweight or obese (MAO) group, respectively. Compared with the MHNW group, the MAO group had a significantly greater risk of a higher prostatectomy Gleason score [odds ratio (OR), 1.907; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.144-3.182], pathological stage (OR, 1.606; 95% CI, 1.035-2.493), and seminal vesicle invasion (OR, 1.673; 95% CI, 1.041-2.687). In contrast, the ORs were not increased in the MHO or MANW group. In the context of normal weight, metabolic disorders were associated with lymph node involvement. The metabolic status and body mass index were not associated with extracapsular extension or surgical margins in any of the four groups.
conclusionThe MAO phenotype is associated with aggressive PCa, including a higher prostatectomy Gleason score, pathological stage, and seminal vesicle invasion and might also be associated with disease progression. Obesity and metabolic disorders act synergistically to increase the pathological risk of PCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.