Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32210593›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2020

Distribution and Frequency of

Mohammad Khaja Mafij Uddin, Arfatur Rahman, Md Fahim Ather, Tanvir Ahmed, Syed Mohammad Mazidur Rahman, Shahriar Ahmed, Sayera Banu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Correlation Between Xpert MTB/RIF Results andInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Multi-drug resistant gene mutation analysis inIranian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Analysis of Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Distribution and frequency of common mutations inJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mohammad Khaja Mafij Uddin *Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Arfatur Rahman *Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-8749-0337
Md Fahim AtherInfectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tanvir AhmedInfectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Syed Mohammad Mazidur RahmanInfectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-2887-6250
Shahriar AhmedInfectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-8833-4130
Sayera BanuInfectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5121-1962
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRifampicin resistance (RR) is a key indicator of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and 95% of the RR is associated with the mutation in the 81-bp rifampicin resistance determining region (RRDR) of the

methodsA total of 205 randomly selected RR-TB specimens detected by Xpert assay were included in this study. A portion of specimens was further subjected to culture, MTBDR

resultsWe found that the most frequent mutation occurred at probe E (S531L) binding region in both Beijing and non-Beijing isolates (61.9% and 66.9%, respectively). The Beijing family had higher mutation rates than non-Beijing (19.0% vs 12.4%) at probe B (D516V) while the non-Beijing family had higher mutations at probe D (H526D or H526Y) than the Beijing (13.2% vs 10.7%) family. Mutations at probes Aand C were less common in both Beijing and non-Beijing isolates. There was no significant difference (

conclusionsThe study results revealed that the most frequent mutation occurs in the region of probe E and the least common mutations at probe A and C among both Beijing and non-Beijing RR-TB cases. This first insight into the probe mutation variation and frequencies among the RR-TB cases in Bangladesh forms the baseline information for further investigation.

Indexed as

GeneXpertMycobacterium tuberculosisprobe mutationsrifampicin resistantspoligotyping

Identifiers

PMID32210593
PMCPMC7073589
OpenAlexW3010134037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.