Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32210537›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2020

Impact of Intraoperative Infusion and Postoperative PCIA of Dexmedetomidine on Early Breastfeeding After Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.

Yu Wang, Xiang Fang, Chao Liu, Xiaotong Ma, Yutong Song, Ming Yan

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03805945 phase4completednot on this map

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Mood and Breastfeeding in Parturient Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled160ConditionsCesarean SectionArmsdexmedetomidine group, control group
NCT07501728 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Prevention of Postpartum Depression in Women Receiving Combined Spinal-Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChengdu Jinjiang Maternity and Child Health HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled270ConditionsPostpartum Depression (PPD)ArmsDexmedetomidine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Breastfeeding interventions for preventing postpartum depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Butorphanol Tartrate Nasal Spray for Post-Cesarean Analgesia and Prolactin Secretion.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  10. Effect of Dexmedetomidine on the EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xiang FangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Chao LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xiaotong MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yutong SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Ming YanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xuzhou Medical College · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Few studies have investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on breastfeeding after cesarean delivery. A randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted to investigate whether the administration of DEX, immediately after delivery and for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), can be beneficial for breastfeeding. Patients and Methods: One hundred sixty parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to the DEX group (a loading dose of DEX was pumped at 0.5 μg/kg within 10 min, followed by a further infusion of DEX at 0.5 μg/kg/h until the end of the surgery and PCIA for 2 days with DEX plus sufentanil) or the standard care group (infusion saline intraoperatively, and PCIA for 2 days with sufentanil). The number of days required to switch to exclusive breastfeeding within six weeks of delivery, the time to first lactation and breast milk volume on day 1 and day 2 after delivery were recorded. Recovery quality, comfort, anxiety, depression, postoperative analgesia, and adverse reactions of parturients were also assessed. Results: Compared with the standard care group, parturients in the DEX group could be converted to exclusive breastfeeding earlier (11 [14] vs 8 [10] days, log-rank P=0.025), the first lactation time was sooner (28.38 [13.82] vs 33.79 [14.85] hrs, P=0.024), and the amount of breast milk on the second day after delivery increased (P=0.012). There was no difference between the two groups in postpartum uterine contraction pain, but postpartum rest and movement VAS scores and recovery quality score in the DEX group were better than those in the standard care group (all P<0.05). Moreover, the hospital anxiety and depression scale and anxiety subscale score on the second day after delivery and the comfort score on the third day after delivery in the DEX group were significantly better than those in the standard care group (5 [5] vs 6 [8], 2 [2] vs 3 [3], 83.58 [6.75] vs 80.48 [6.58]; P=0.013, P=0.005, P=0.006, respectively). The incidence of adverse events, such as bradycardia, vomiting, hypersomnia, hypertension and hypotension, was not significantly different between the DEX and standard care groups (6.9% vs 2.7%, 5.6% vs 13.7%, 4.2% vs 0%, 5.6% vs 2.7%, 11.1% vs 8.2%; P=0.275, P=0.158, P=0.366, P=0.681, P=0.556, respectively), except more parturients experienced nausea in the standard care group than in the DEX group (28.8% vs 11.1%, P=0.012). Furthermore, there was no difference in Neonatal Behavioral Neurological Assessment scores on the first and second days after delivery between the DEX and standard care groups (38 [3] vs 37 [2], 38.5 [2] vs 38 [2]; P=0.173, P=0.312, respectively). Conclusion: The application of DEX in the perioperative period of cesarean section was not only conducive to the early conversion of infant feeding to exclusive breastfeeding but could also improve the recovery quality and comfort of the parturient, optimize analgesia, shorten the time to first lactation, and increase lactation. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03805945.

Indexed as

Analgesia, Patient-ControlledCesarean SectionAdultAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticBreast FeedingDexmedetomidineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMolecular StructurePostoperative PainPregnancyProspective StudiesStructure-Activity RelationshipAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticDexmedetomidinebreastfeedingcesarean sectiondexmedetomidineintraoperative infusionpostoperative PCIA

Identifiers

PMID32210537
PMCPMC7073426
OpenAlexW3012440253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.