Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32210518›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2020

Health in All Policy Making Utilizing Big Data.

Alice G Vassiliou, Christina Georgakopoulou, Alexandra Papageorgiou, Spiros Georgakopoulos, Spiros Goulas, Theodoros Paschalis, Panagiotis Paterakis, Parisis Gallos, Dimos Kyriazis, Vassilis Plagianakos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Attitudes towards data access and sharing health data for research: a case study of Australian data custodian perspectives.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alice G VassiliouHellenic National Organization for the Provision of Health Services, Athens, Greece.
Christina GeorgakopoulouHellenic National Organization for the Provision of Health Services, Athens, Greece.
Alexandra PapageorgiouHellenic National Organization for the Provision of Health Services, Athens, Greece.
Spiros GeorgakopoulosHellenic National Organization for the Provision of Health Services, Athens, Greece.
Spiros GoulasHellenic National Organization for the Provision of Health Services, Athens, Greece.
Theodoros PaschalisHellenic National Organization for the Provision of Health Services, Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis PaterakisHellenic National Organization for the Provision of Health Services, Athens, Greece.
Parisis GallosHellenic National Organization for the Provision of Health Services, Athens, Greece.
Dimos KyriazisUniversity of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece.
Vassilis PlagianakosHellenic National Organization for the Provision of Health Services, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth in all Policies (HiAP) is a valuable method for effective Healthcare policy development. Big data analysis can be useful to both individuals and clinicians so that the full potential of big data is employed.

aimThe present paper deals with Health in All Policies, and how the use of Big Data can lead and support the development of new policies.

methodsTo this end, in the context of the CrowdHEALTH project, data from heterogeneous sources will be exploited and the Policy Development Toolkit (PDT) model will be used. In order to facilitate new insights to healthcare by exploiting all available data sources.

resultsIn the case study that is being proposed, the NOHS Story Board (inpatient and outpatient health care) utilizing data from reimbursement of disease-related groups (DRGs), as well as medical costs for outpatient data, will be analyzed by the PDT.

conclusionPDT seems promising as an efficient decision support system for policymakers to align with HiAP as it offers Causal Analysis by calculating the total cost (expenses) per ICD-10, Forecasting Information by measuring the clinical effectiveness of reimbursement cost per medical condition, per gender and per age for outpatient healthcare, and Risk Stratification by investigating Screening Parameters, Indexes (Indicators) and other factors related to healthcare management. Thus, PDT could also support HiAP by helping policymakers to tailor various policies according to their needs, such as reduction of healthcare cost, improvement of clinical effectiveness and restriction of fraud.

Indexed as

Big DataHealth PolicyPolicy-Making

Identifiers

PMID32210518
PMCPMC7085317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.