ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2020
Modelling and Evaluation of Policies.
Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence-based Public Health Policy Models Development and Evaluation using Big Data Analytics and Web Technologies.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNCDs (non-communicable diseases) are considered an important social issue and a financial burden to the health care systems in the EU which can be decreased if cost-effective policies are implemented, along with proactive interventions. The CrowdHEALTH project recognizes that NCD poses a burden for the healthcare sector and society and aims at focusing on NCDs' public health policies.
aimThe aim of this paper is to present the concept of Public Health Policy (PHP), elaborate on the state-of-the-art of PHPs development, and propose a first approach to the modeling and evaluation of PHPs used in a toolkit that is going to support decision making, the Policy Development Toolkit (PDT).
methodsThe policy creation module is a part of the PDT aiming to integrate the results of the rest of the health analytics and policy components. It is the module that selects, filters, and aggregates all relevant information to help policy-makers with the decision making process. The policies creation component is connected to the visualization component to provide the final users with data visualization on different PHPs, including outcomes from data-driven models, such as risk stratification, clinical pathways mining, forecasting or causal analysis models, outcomes from cost-benefit analysis, and suggestions and recommendations from the results of different measured KPIs, using data from the Holistic Health Records (HHRs).
resultsIn the context of CrowdHEALTH project, PHP can be defined as the decisions taken for actions by those responsible in the public sector that covers a set of actions or inactions that affect a group of public and private actors of the health care system. In the CrowdHEALTH project, the Policy Development Toolkit works as the main interface between the final users and the whole system in the CrowdHEALTH platform. The three components related to policy creation are: (i) the policy modeling component, (ii) the population identification component and (iii) the policy evaluation component. In policy evaluation, KPIs are used as measurable indicators to help prevent ambiguity problems in the interpretation of the model and the structure.
conclusionsThis initial Policy creation component design might be modified during the project life circle according to the concept complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.