Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32210433›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

One-year clinical outcomes of patients with versus without acute coronary syndrome with 3-month duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after everolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Masahiro Natsuaki, Takeshi Morimoto, Erika Yamamoto, Hirotoshi Watanabe, Yutaka Furukawa, Mitsuru Abe, Koichi Nakao, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Kazuya Kawai, Kei Yunoki and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiro NatsuakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Takeshi MorimotoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Erika YamamotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hirotoshi WatanabeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9443-5915
Yutaka FurukawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Mitsuru AbeDivision of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Koichi NakaoDivision of Cardiology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tetsuya IshikawaDivision of Cardiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan.
Kazuya KawaiDivision of Cardiology, Chikamori Hospital, Kochi, Japan.
Kei YunokiDivision of Cardiology, Tsuyama Central Hospital, Tsuyama, Japan.
Shogo ShimizuDivision of Cardiology, Mashiko Hospital, Kawaguchi, Japan.
Masaharu AkaoDivision of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Shinji MikiDivision of Cardiology, Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Masashi YamamotoDivision of Cardiology, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Kimitsu, Japan.
Hisayuki OkadaDivision of Cardiology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Kozo HoshinoDivision of Cardiology, Nagai Hospital, Tsu, Japan.
Kazushige KadotaDepartment of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.
Yoshihiro MorinoDivision of Cardiology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Morioka, Japan.
Keiichi Igarashi HanaokaDivision of Cardiology, Hanaokaseishu Memorial Cardiovascular Clinic, Sapporo, Japan.
Kengo TanabeDivision of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken KozumaDivision of Cardiology, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi KimuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5256-8322
STOPDAPT trial investigators
Kyoto University · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPChikamori Hospital · JPDokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JPHyogo Medical University · JPIwate Medical University · JPKobe City Medical Center General Hospital · JPKurashiki Central Hospital · JPMitsubishi Kyoto Hospital · JPMitsui Memorial Hospital · JPNaga Municipal Hospital · JPSaga University · JPSaiseikai Kumamoto Hospital · JPSeirei Hamamatsu General Hospital · JPTeikyo University Hospital · JPTsuyama Chuo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been no previous prospective study evaluating 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The STOPDAPT trial is a prospective multi-center single-arm study evaluating 3-month DAPT duration in all-comer population after CoCr-EES implantation. Among 1525 study patients enrolled from 58 Japanese centers, the present study compared the 1-year clinical outcomes between ACS patients (N = 487) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients (N = 1038). In the ACS group, 228 patients (47%) had unstable angina and 259 patients (53%) had myocardial infarction. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, definite stent thrombosis (ST) and TIMI major/minor bleeding. Thienopyridine was discontinued within 4-month in 455 patients (94.0%) in the ACS group and 977 patients (94.3%) in the stable CAD group. Cumulative 1-year incidence of and the adjusted risk for the primary endpoint were not significantly different between the ACS and stable CAD groups (2.3% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.42, and HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.44-1.87, P = 0.87). In the 3-month landmark analysis, cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was also not significantly different between the ACS and stable CAD groups (1.3% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.16). There was no definite/probable ST through 1-year in both groups. In the propensity matched analysis, the cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint were similar between the ACS and stable CAD groups (2.3% versus 2.1%, P = 0.82). In conclusion, stopping DAPT at 3 months after CoCr-EES implantation in patients with ACS including 47% of unstable angina was as safe as that in patients with stable CAD.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationEverolimusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionEverolimusPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32210433
PMCPMC7094877
OpenAlexW3013382234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.