Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32210428›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Social scientists' testimony before Congress in the United States between 1946-2016, trends from a new dataset.

Thomas V Maher, Charles Seguin, Yongjun Zhang, Andrew P Davis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas V MaherDepartment of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8583-6995
Charles SeguinDepartment of Sociology, Penn State University, State College, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Yongjun ZhangSchool of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8265-925X
Andrew P DavisDepartment of Sociology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina State, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5522-1797
North Carolina State University · USPennsylvania State University · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congressional hearings are a venue in which social scientists present their views and analyses before lawmakers in the United States, however quantitative data on their representation has been lacking. We present new, publicly available, data on the rates at which anthropologists, economists, political scientists, psychologists, and sociologists appeared before United States congressional hearings from 1946 through 2016. We show that social scientists were present at some 10,347 hearings and testified 15,506 times. Economists testify before the US Congress far more often than other social scientists, and constitute a larger proportion of the social scientists testifying in industry and government positions. We find that social scientists' testimony is increasingly on behalf of think tanks; political scientists, in particular, have gained much more representation through think tanks. Sociology, and psychology's representation before Congress has declined considerably beginning in the 1980s. Anthropologists were the least represented. These findings show that academics are representing a more diverse set of organizations, but economists continue to be far more represented than other disciplines before the US Congress.

Indexed as

GovernmentPolicy MakingPoliticsAnthropologyDatasets as TopicHumansIndustryPsychologyPublic HealthSocial SciencesTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32210428
PMCPMC7094826
OpenAlexW3013440995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.