Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32210299›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Limitations of concurrently representing objects within view and in visual working memory.

Tengfei Liang, Zijian Cheng, Wenjing Hu, Chaoxiong Ye, Jiafeng Zhang, Qiang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tengfei LiangInstitute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610000, China.
Zijian ChengResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China.
Wenjing HuResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China.
Chaoxiong YeInstitute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610000, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8301-7582
Jiafeng ZhangCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Qiang LiuInstitute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610000, China. lq780614@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Representing visibly present stimuli is as limited in capacity as representing invisible stimuli in visual working memory (WM). In this study, we explored whether concurrently representing stimuli within view affects representing objects in visual WM, and if so, whether this effect is modulated by the storage states (active and silent state) of memory contents? In experiment 1, participants were asked to perform the change-detect task in a simultaneous-representing condition in which WM content and the continuously-visible stimuli in view were simultaneously represented, as well as a baseline condition in which only the representations of visual WM content were maintained. The results showed that the representations in visual WM would be impaired when the continuously-visible stimuli in view were concurrently represented, revealed by the reduced CDA amplitude and the lower behavior performance. In experiment 2, a dual-serial retro-cue paradigm was adopted to guide participants to maintain memory items in two different storage states, and the results revealed that simultaneously representing the continuously-visible stimuli and the WM content would only impair the WM representations in the active state. These evidences demonstrated that only the visual WM representations that were maintained in the active state would definitely share the limited resources with the representations of continuously-visible information, and further supported the dissociation between the active state and silent state of visual WM storage.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleNontherapeutic Human ExperimentationPhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32210299
PMCPMC7093397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.