Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32210213›Full record

ReviewDentistry journal2020

Dental Plaque Removal by Ultrasonic Toothbrushes.

Ilya Digel, Inna Kern, Eva Maria Geenen, Nuraly Akimbekov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dentistry journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessment of Interleukin-6 Levels andInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exploring the Inhibitory Potential ofTheScientificWorldJournal · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilya DigelLaboratory for Cell- and Microbiology, FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences, 52428 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3418-0252
Inna KernLaboratory for Cell- and Microbiology, FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences, 52428 Juelich, Germany.
Eva Maria GeenenLaboratory for Cell- and Microbiology, FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences, 52428 Juelich, Germany.
Nuraly AkimbekovDepartment of Biotechnology, al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 050040 Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-8658-581X
FH Aachen · DEAl-Farabi Kazakh National University · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the variety of toothbrushes on the market, the question arises, which toothbrush is best suited to maintain oral health? This thematic review focuses first on plaque formation mechanisms and then on the plaque removal effectiveness of ultrasonic toothbrushes and their potential in preventing oral diseases like periodontitis, gingivitis, and caries. We overviewed the physical effects that occurred during brushing and tried to address the question of whether ultrasonic toothbrushes effectively reduced the microbial burden by increasing the hydrodynamic forces. The results of published studies show that electric toothbrushes, which combine ultrasonic and sonic (or acoustic and mechanic) actions, may have the most promising effect on good oral health. Existing ultrasonic/sonic toothbrush models do not significantly differ regarding the removal of dental biofilm and the reduction of gingival inflammation compared with other electrically powered toothbrushes, whereas the manual toothbrushes show a lower effectiveness.

Indexed as

dental biofilmsdental plaque removalpowered toothbrushesultrasonic toothbrushing

Identifiers

PMID32210213
PMCPMC7175112
OpenAlexW3012724459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.