Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32210199›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Using Rough Sets to Improve Activity Recognition Based on Sensor Data.

Hans W Guesgen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hans W GuesgenSchool of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-5946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activity recognition plays a central role in many sensor-based applications, such as smart homes for instance. Given a stream of sensor data, the goal is to determine the activities that triggered the sensor data. This article shows how spatial information can be used to improve the process of recognizing activities in smart homes. The sensors that are used in smart homes are in most cases installed in fixed locations, which means that when a particular sensor is triggered, we know approximately where the activity takes place. However, since different sensors may be involved in different occurrences of the same type of activity, the set of sensors associated with a particular activity is not precisely defined. In this article, we use rough sets rather than standard sets to denote the sensors involved in an activity to model, which enables us to deal with this imprecision. Using publicly available data sets, we will demonstrate that rough sets can adequately capture useful information to assist with the activity recognition process. We will also show that rough sets lend themselves to creating Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). activity recognition; context awareness; spatial reasoning; rough sets.

Indexed as

activity recognitioncontext awarenessrough setsspatial reasoning

Identifiers

PMID32210199
PMCPMC7146264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.