ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
A Method of Interstory Drift Monitoring Using a Smartphone and a Laser Device.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interstory drift is an important engineering parameter in building design and building structural health monitoring. However, many problems exist in current interstory drift monitoring methods. The traditional method is imprecise-double numerical integration of acceleration data-and other direct monitoring methods need professional equipment. This paper proposes a method to solve these problems by monitoring the interstory drift with a smartphone and a laser device. In this method, a laser device is installed on the ceiling while a smartphone is fixed on a steel projection plate on the floor. Compared with a reference sensor, the method designed in this study shows that a smartphone is competent in monitoring the interstory drift. This method utilizes a smartphone application (APP) named D-Viewer to implement monitoring and data storage just in one place, which is also inexpensive. The results showed that this method has an average percent error of 3.37%, with a standard deviation of 2.67%. With the popularization of the smartphone, this method is promising in acquiring large amounts of data, which will be significant for building assessment after an earthquake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.