Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32210063›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Enhancing Radiation Detection by Drones through Numerical Fluid Dynamics Simulations.

Fabio Marturano, Jean-François Ciparisse, Andrea Chierici, Francesco d'Errico, Daniele Di Giovanni, Francesca Fumian, Riccardo Rossi, Luca Martellucci, Pasquale Gaudio, Andrea Malizia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risks of Drone Use in Light of Literature Studies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio MarturanoDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Jean-François CiparisseDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Andrea ChiericiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Francesco d'ErricoDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy.
Daniele Di GiovanniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Francesca FumianDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Riccardo RossiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4414-6119
Luca MartellucciDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6791-1261
Pasquale GaudioDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0861-558X
Andrea MaliziaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4123-1716
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study addresses the optimization of the location of a radioactive-particle sensor on a drone. Based on the analysis of the physical process and of the boundary conditions introduced in the model, computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed to analyze how the turbulence caused by drone propellers may influence the response of the sensors. Our initial focus was the detection of a small amount of radioactivity, such as that associated with a release of medical waste. Drones equipped with selective low-cost sensors could be quickly sent to dangerous areas that first responders might not have access to and be able to assess the level of danger in a few seconds, providing details about the source terms to Radiological-Nuclear (RN) advisors and decision-makers. Our ultimate application is the simulation of complex scenarios where fluid-dynamic instabilities are combined with elevated levels of radioactivity, as was the case during the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear power plant accidents. In similar circumstances, accurate mapping of the radioactive plume would provide invaluable input-data for the mathematical models that can predict the dispersion of radioactivity in time and space. This information could be used as input for predictive models and decision support systems (DSS) to get a full situational awareness. In particular, these models may be used either to guide the safe intervention of first responders or the later need to evacuate affected regions.

Indexed as

detectiondroneinstrumentationmeasureradiationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID32210063
PMCPMC7147154
OpenAlexW3012565125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.