Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32210028›Full record

ReviewGenes2020

Experimental Evolution of Legume Symbionts: What Have We Learnt?

Ginaini Grazielli Doin de Moura, Philippe Remigi, Catherine Masson-Boivin, Delphine Capela

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Why are rhizobial symbiosis genes mobile?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Minimal gene set fromProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transfer of the Symbiotic Plasmid ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ginaini Grazielli Doin de MouraLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan 31320, France.
Philippe RemigiLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan 31320, France.
Catherine Masson-BoivinLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan 31320, France.
Delphine CapelaLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan 31320, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhizobia, the nitrogen-fixing symbionts of legumes, are polyphyletic bacteria distributed in many alpha- and beta-proteobacterial genera. They likely emerged and diversified through independent horizontal transfers of key symbiotic genes. To replay the evolution of a new rhizobium genus under laboratory conditions, the symbiotic plasmid of

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSymbiosisFabaceaeRhizobiumSelection, Geneticexperimental evolutionnitrogen fixationrhizobia

Identifiers

PMID32210028
PMCPMC7141107
OpenAlexW3012622746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.