Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32209825›Full record

ArticleCritical pathways in cardiology2020

Community Health Workers Reduce Rehospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits for Low-Socioeconomic Urban Patients With Heart Failure.

Adam S Vohra, Rhys F M Chua, Stephanie A Besser, Charina F Alcain, Sweta Basnet, Brenda Battle, Mitchell J Coplan, James K Liao, Corey E Tabit

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical pathways in cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam S VohraFrom the Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Rhys F M ChuaSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and.
Stephanie A BesserSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and.
Charina F AlcainSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and.
Sweta BasnetUrban Health Initiative, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Brenda BattleUrban Health Initiative, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Mitchell J CoplanSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and.
James K LiaoSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and.
Corey E TabitSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Mechanisms Underlying Vascular AgingR01HL136962 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LIAO, JAMES KUANG-JAN · 2018 to 2021
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-socioeconomic, urban, minority patients with heart failure (HF) often have unique barriers to care. Community health workers (CHWs) are specially trained laypeople who serve as liaisons between underserved communities and the health system. It is not known whether CHWs improve outcomes in low-socioeconomic, urban, minority patients with HF. HYPOTHESIS: CHWs reduce rehospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and healthcare costs for low-socioeconomic urban patients with HF.

methodsPatients admitted with acute decompensated HF were assigned to receive weekly visits by CHW after discharge. Patients were propensity score matched with controls who received usual care. HF-related rehospitalizations, ED visits, and inpatient costs were compared for 12 months following index admission versus the same period before.

resultsTwenty-eight patients who received weekly visits from a CHW for 12 months after discharge were matched with 28 control patients who did not receive CHWs. Patients who received a CHW had a 75% decrease in HF-related ED visits (0.71 vs. 0.18 visits per patient, P < 0.001), an 89% decrease in HF-related readmissions (0.64 vs. 0.07 admissions per patient, P < 0.005), and a significant decrease in inpatient cost for HF-related visits. In controls receiving usual care, there was no significant change in hospitalizations, ED visits, or costs.

conclusionsIn conclusion, CHWs are associated with reduced rehospitalizations, ED visits, and inpatient costs in low-socioeconomic, urban, minority patients with HF. CHWs may be a cost-effective method to reduce health care utilization and improve outcomes for this population.

Indexed as

Urban PopulationAdultAgedCommunity Health WorkersEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHeart FailureHumansIllinoisIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOffice VisitsPatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32209825
PMCPMC7679953
OpenAlexW3013289103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.