Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32209773›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2020

Collagen scaffold combined with human umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cells transplantation for acute complete spinal cord injury.

Wu-Sheng Deng, Ke Ma, Bing Liang, Xiao-Yin Liu, Hui-You Xu, Jian Zhang, Heng-Yuan Shi, Hong-Tao Sun, Xu-Yi Chen, Sai Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wu-Sheng DengCollege of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China.
Ke MaTianjin Key Laboratory of Neurotrauma Repair, Pingjin Hospital Brain Center, characteristic medical center of Chinese people's armed police force, Tianjin, China.
Bing LiangTianjin Key Laboratory of Neurotrauma Repair, Pingjin Hospital Brain Center, characteristic medical center of Chinese people's armed police force, Tianjin, China.
Xiao-Yin LiuClinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Hui-You XuTianjin Key Laboratory of Neurotrauma Repair, Pingjin Hospital Brain Center, characteristic medical center of Chinese people's armed police force, Tianjin, China.
Jian ZhangTianjin Key Laboratory of Neurotrauma Repair, Pingjin Hospital Brain Center, characteristic medical center of Chinese people's armed police force, Tianjin, China.
Heng-Yuan ShiClinical School of Medicine, Logistics University of People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, China.
Hong-Tao SunTianjin Key Laboratory of Neurotrauma Repair, Pingjin Hospital Brain Center, characteristic medical center of Chinese people's armed police force, Tianjin, China.
Xu-Yi ChenTianjin Key Laboratory of Neurotrauma Repair, Pingjin Hospital Brain Center, characteristic medical center of Chinese people's armed police force, Tianjin, China.
Sai ZhangTianjin Key Laboratory of Neurotrauma Repair, Pingjin Hospital Brain Center, characteristic medical center of Chinese people's armed police force, Tianjin, China.
Pingjin Hospital · CNChinese People's Armed Police ForceGansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNLogistics University of People's Armed Police Force · CNTianjin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is no effective strategy to promote functional recovery after a spinal cord injury. Collagen scaffolds can not only provide support and guidance for axonal regeneration, but can also serve as a bridge for nerve regeneration at the injury site. They can additionally be used as carriers to retain mesenchymal stem cells at the injury site to enhance their effectiveness. Hence, we hypothesized that transplanting human umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cells on collagen scaffolds would enhance healing following acute complete spinal cord injury. Here, we test this hypothesis through animal studies and a phase I clinical trial. (1) Animal experiments: Models of completely transected spinal cord injury were established in rats and canines by microsurgery. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from neonatal umbilical cord tissue were adsorbed onto collagen scaffolds and surgically implanted at the injury site in rats and canines; the animals were observed after 1 week-6 months. The transplantation resulted in increased motor scores, enhanced amplitude and shortened latency of the motor evoked potential, and reduced injury area as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. (2) Phase I clinical trial: Forty patients with acute complete cervical injuries were enrolled at the Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force and divided into two groups. The treatment group (n = 20) received collagen scaffolds loaded with mesenchymal stem cells derived from neonatal umbilical cord tissues; the control group (n = 20) did not receive the stem-cell loaded collagen implant. All patients were followed for 12 months. In the treatment group, the American Spinal Injury Association scores and activities of daily life scores were increased, bowel and urinary functions were recovered, and residual urine volume was reduced compared with the pre-treatment baseline. Furthermore, magnetic resonance imaging showed that new nerve fiber connections were formed, and diffusion tensor imaging showed that electrophysiological activity was recovered after the treatment. No serious complication was observed during follow-up. In contrast, the neurological functions of the patients in the control group were not improved over the follow-up period. The above data preliminarily demonstrate that the transplantation of human umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cells on a collagen scaffold can promote the recovery of neurological function after acute spinal cord injury. In the future, these results need to be confirmed in a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial with a larger sample size. The clinical trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force on February 3, 2016 (approval No. PJHEC-2016-A8). All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force on May 20, 2015 (approval No. PJHEC-2015-D5).

Indexed as

caninecollagen scaffoldshumanhuman umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cellsnerve regenerationratspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID32209773
PMCPMC7437585
OpenAlexW3008597140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.