Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32209621›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Effectiveness of a guided online mindfulness-focused intervention in a student population: Study protocol for a randomised control trial.

Dana Schultchen, Ann-Marie Küchler, Christine Schillings, Felicitas Weineck, Alexander Karabatsiakis, David D Ebert, Harald Baumeister, Olga Pollatos

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. A Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness, Acceptance, and Negative Effects ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dana SchultchenDepartment of Clinical & Health Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany dana.schultchen@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5623-535X
Ann-Marie KüchlerDepartment of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3305-4892
Christine SchillingsDepartment of Clinical & Health Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8807-9547
Felicitas WeineckDepartment of Clinical & Health Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-8257
Alexander KarabatsiakisClinical Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5822-0108
David D EbertDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- & Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6820-0146
Harald BaumeisterDepartment of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2040-661X
Olga PollatosDepartment of Clinical & Health Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0512-565X
Universität Ulm · DEUniversität Innsbruck · ATVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies show that university students experience higher psychological stress than the general population, resulting in increased vulnerability for mental disorders for the student population. Online mindfulness interventions will be delivered to students as a potentially promising and more flexible approach compared to face-to-face interventions with the aim of improving their mental health. This study purposes to investigate the effectiveness of a guided online mindfulness-focused intervention for university students by using both self-reported and psychobiological measures. METHODS AND ANALYSES: In this multicentre, two-armed randomised controlled trial with a parallel design, a guided version of the online mindfulness-focused intervention 'StudiCare Mindfulness' will be compared with a waitlist control group. In total, 120 participants will be recruited at different universities (of Applied Sciences) in (Neu-) Ulm. Data will be assessed prior to randomisation, after eight weeks (post-intervention) and six months after randomisation (follow-up). The primary outcome measure is mindfulness. The secondary outcome measures include depression, anxiety and stress levels, well-being, interoceptive sensibility, emotion regulation and alexithymia. Psychobiological parameters comprise interoceptive accuracy, hair cortisol and FKBP5 genotype. Sociodemographic variables, treatment expectations, side and adverse side effects, as well as intervention satisfaction and adherence will be assessed. All data analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All study procedures have been approved by the Ethics Committee of Ulm University (application No. 48/18). The findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00014701.

Indexed as

MindfulnessAdolescentAdultHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStress, PsychologicalStudentsYoung AdulteffectivenesseHealthmindfulnessonline interventionpsychobiological measuresRCTstress

Identifiers

PMID32209621
PMCPMC7202707
OpenAlexW3013701287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.