Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32209569›Full record

ArticleGenetics2020

Space is the Place: Effects of Continuous Spatial Structure on Analysis of Population Genetic Data.

C J Battey, Peter L Ralph, Andrew D Kern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Study design and the sampling of deleterious rare variants in biobank-scale datasets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Drivers of genetic diversity across the marine tree of life.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A geographic history of human genetic ancestry.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  13. The origin, invasion history and resistance architecture ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Resource-explicit interactions in spatial population models.Methods in ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C J BatteyInstitute of Ecology Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon cbattey2@uoregon.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9958-4282
Peter L Ralph *Institute of Ecology Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-9459-6866
Andrew D Kern *Institute of Ecology Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-4381-4680

Funding

POPULATION GENOMICS OF ADAPTATIONR01GM117241 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI KERN, ANDREW D · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real geography is continuous, but standard models in population genetics are based on discrete, well-mixed populations. As a result, many methods of analyzing genetic data assume that samples are a random draw from a well-mixed population, but are applied to clustered samples from populations that are structured clinally over space. Here, we use simulations of populations living in continuous geography to study the impacts of dispersal and sampling strategy on population genetic summary statistics, demographic inference, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We find that most common summary statistics have distributions that differ substantially from those seen in well-mixed populations, especially when Wright's neighborhood size is < 100 and sampling is spatially clustered. "Stepping-stone" models reproduce some of these effects, but discretizing the landscape introduces artifacts that in some cases are exacerbated at higher resolutions. The combination of low dispersal and clustered sampling causes demographic inference from the site frequency spectrum to infer more turbulent demographic histories, but averaged results across multiple simulations revealed surprisingly little systematic bias. We also show that the combination of spatially autocorrelated environments and limited dispersal causes GWAS to identify spurious signals of genetic association with purely environmentally determined phenotypes, and that this bias is only partially corrected by regressing out principal components of ancestry. Last, we discuss the relevance of our simulation results for inference from genetic variation in real organisms.

Indexed as

EcosystemModels, GeneticPolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsGenome-Wide Association StudyHaplotypesHumansPhenotypePopulationdemographyGWAShaplotype block sharingpopulation structurespace

Identifiers

PMID32209569
PMCPMC7198281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.