ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020
Volumetric Food Quantification Using Computer Vision on a Depth-Sensing Smartphone: Preclinical Study.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Role of Mobile Apps in Obesity Management: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- AI-based digital image dietary assessment methods compared to humans and ground truth: a systematic review.Annals of medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical Decision Support for Digital Dietary Counseling Under GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy: Convergent Mixed Methods Usability and Treatment Satisfaction Pilot Study of the Personalized Nutrition Advisor.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Limited validity of an AI-powered app for dietary assessment in females with obesity.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative accuracy of automated carbohydrate estimation using NutriDish and ChatGPT-5 against dietitian-derived reference values.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- AI powered dietary proportion assessment for improving accuracy and practicality of the balanced meal plate model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- App-based automated meal analysis in adults with type 1 diabetes using automated insulin delivery: a randomized controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Advancements in Using AI for Dietary Assessment Based on Food Images: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Innovative food supply chain through spatial computing technologies: A review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2024Review
- Multimedia Data-Based Mobile Applications for Dietary Assessment.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Review
- Article
- Assessing daily energy intake in adult women: validity of a food-recognition mobile application compared to doubly labelled water.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Mobile Computer Vision-Based Applications for Food Recognition and Volume and Calorific Estimation: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Adherence and Persistence to Insulin Therapy in People with Diabetes: Impact of Connected Insulin Pen Delivery Ecosystem.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Review
- A Novel Approach to Dining Bowl Reconstruction for Image-Based Food Volume Estimation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Automated food intake tracking requires depth-refined semantic segmentation to rectify visual-volume discordance in long-term care homes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Digital Solutions to Diagnose and Manage Postbariatric Hypoglycemia.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuantification of dietary intake is key to the prevention and management of numerous metabolic disorders. Conventional approaches are challenging, laborious, and lack accuracy. The recent advent of depth-sensing smartphones in conjunction with computer vision could facilitate reliable quantification of food intake.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel smartphone app combining depth-sensing hardware with computer vision to quantify meal macronutrient content using volumetry.
methodsThe app ran on a smartphone with a built-in depth sensor applying structured light (iPhone X). The app estimated weight, macronutrient (carbohydrate, protein, fat), and energy content of 48 randomly chosen meals (breakfasts, cooked meals, snacks) encompassing 128 food items. The reference weight was generated by weighing individual food items using a precision scale. The study endpoints were (1) error of estimated meal weight, (2) error of estimated meal macronutrient content and energy content, (3) segmentation performance, and (4) processing time.
resultsIn both absolute and relative terms, the mean (SD) absolute errors of the app's estimates were 35.1 g (42.8 g; relative absolute error: 14.0% [12.2%]) for weight; 5.5 g (5.1 g; relative absolute error: 14.8% [10.9%]) for carbohydrate content; 1.3 g (1.7 g; relative absolute error: 12.3% [12.8%]) for fat content; 2.4 g (5.6 g; relative absolute error: 13.0% [13.8%]) for protein content; and 41.2 kcal (42.5 kcal; relative absolute error: 12.7% [10.8%]) for energy content. Although estimation accuracy was not affected by the viewing angle, the type of meal mattered, with slightly worse performance for cooked meals than for breakfasts and snacks. Segmentation adjustment was required for 7 of the 128 items. Mean (SD) processing time across all meals was 22.9 seconds (8.6 seconds).
conclusionsThis study evaluated the accuracy of a novel smartphone app with an integrated depth-sensing camera and found highly accurate volume estimation across a broad range of food items. In addition, the system demonstrated high segmentation performance and low processing time, highlighting its usability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.