Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32209531›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Volumetric Food Quantification Using Computer Vision on a Depth-Sensing Smartphone: Preclinical Study.

David Herzig, Christos T Nakas, Janine Stalder, Christophe Kosinski, Céline Laesser, Joachim Dehais, Raphael Jaeggi, Alexander Benedikt Leichtle, Fried-Michael Dahlweid, Christoph Stettler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Innovative food supply chain through spatial computing technologies: A review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2024
    Review
  11. Multimedia Data-Based Mobile Applications for Dietary Assessment.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David Herzig *Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1028-9445
Christos T Nakas *Laboratory of Biometry, University of Thessaly, Nea Ionia/Volos, Magnesia, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-722X
Janine StalderDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1077-6454
Christophe KosinskiDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7544-498X
Céline LaesserDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7747-316X
Joachim DehaisDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-8475
Raphael JaeggiDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7742-1469
Alexander Benedikt LeichtleUniversity Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6528-9904
Fried-Michael DahlweidInsel Data Science Center & Department for Technology and Innovation, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5416-9915
Christoph Stettler *Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-6059
Lia Bally *Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1993-7672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantification of dietary intake is key to the prevention and management of numerous metabolic disorders. Conventional approaches are challenging, laborious, and lack accuracy. The recent advent of depth-sensing smartphones in conjunction with computer vision could facilitate reliable quantification of food intake.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel smartphone app combining depth-sensing hardware with computer vision to quantify meal macronutrient content using volumetry.

methodsThe app ran on a smartphone with a built-in depth sensor applying structured light (iPhone X). The app estimated weight, macronutrient (carbohydrate, protein, fat), and energy content of 48 randomly chosen meals (breakfasts, cooked meals, snacks) encompassing 128 food items. The reference weight was generated by weighing individual food items using a precision scale. The study endpoints were (1) error of estimated meal weight, (2) error of estimated meal macronutrient content and energy content, (3) segmentation performance, and (4) processing time.

resultsIn both absolute and relative terms, the mean (SD) absolute errors of the app's estimates were 35.1 g (42.8 g; relative absolute error: 14.0% [12.2%]) for weight; 5.5 g (5.1 g; relative absolute error: 14.8% [10.9%]) for carbohydrate content; 1.3 g (1.7 g; relative absolute error: 12.3% [12.8%]) for fat content; 2.4 g (5.6 g; relative absolute error: 13.0% [13.8%]) for protein content; and 41.2 kcal (42.5 kcal; relative absolute error: 12.7% [10.8%]) for energy content. Although estimation accuracy was not affected by the viewing angle, the type of meal mattered, with slightly worse performance for cooked meals than for breakfasts and snacks. Segmentation adjustment was required for 7 of the 128 items. Mean (SD) processing time across all meals was 22.9 seconds (8.6 seconds).

conclusionsThis study evaluated the accuracy of a novel smartphone app with an integrated depth-sensing camera and found highly accurate volume estimation across a broad range of food items. In addition, the system demonstrated high segmentation performance and low processing time, highlighting its usability.

Indexed as

SmartphoneComputersEatingHumansNutrientsNutrientscomputer visiondepth cameradietary assessmentsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID32209531
PMCPMC7142738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.