Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32209514›Full record

ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2020

Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear.

Vedat Topsakal, Marco Matulic, Masoud Zoka Assadi, Griet Mertens, Vincent Van Rompaey, Paul Van de Heyning

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Audiological outcomes of robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Trial
  5. Anatomical investigation of safety determining factors for keyhole drilling trajectories for robotic cochlear implant surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Evaluating round window niche visibility in cochlear implantation: anatomical insights and electrode insertion strategies.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Noise exposure of the inner ear during robotic drilling.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bilateral Anterior Displaced Sigmoid Sinus in Cochlear Implantation: A Proposed Solution.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vedat TopsakalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium;Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Marco MatulicDepartment of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Masoud Zoka AssadiMED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria.
Griet MertensDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium;Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Vincent Van RompaeyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium;Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Paul Van de HeyningDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium;Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe ideal outcome of cochlear implant surgery involves the insertion of the array inside the scala tympani of the cochlea with the least mechanical trauma. Recently, round window insertion and the direction in which the cochlea is approached have gained attention in this respect. The Angles of Cochlear Approach (ACA) can be defined with a plane in the plane of the basal turn, termed the in-plane angle, and the plane orthogonal to this plane, termed the out-plane angle. The aim of this study was to compare the trajectory angles for different surgical techniques of Veria, suprameatal, pericanal, and multiple posterior tympanotomy (PT) approaches, including an optimal trajectory that is simulated for robotic surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe trajectories of these surgical techniques were simulated on the same high-resolution computed tomography scan. The simulated trajectory angles were analyzed with dedicated software for medical images, defining the ACA and distances to critical otological structures.

resultsThe ACA are the smallest for surgical techniques that pass thought the PT. However, performing a surgical PT can include variability in the ACA, ranging from almost 0° to 20.8° in an out-plane angle, depending on how close a surgeon would approach the facial nerve. The Veria, Suprameatal approach (SMA), and peri-canal approaches have larger ACA and minimal distances to the ossicular chain and the ear canal. The maximum distance to the facial nerve and the widest out-plane angle is observe with a pericanal approach. The optimal PT approach refers to the trajectory without collisions and with the best possible ACA that can be planned.

conclusionDifferent surgical approaches yield important differences in the ACA. PT allows better ACA with maximum distances to the critical structures. However, the optimal PT trajectory simulated for robotic keyhole surgery is a further improvement on the trajectories through the facial recess.

Indexed as

CochleaCochlear ImplantationComputer SimulationEar CanalEar, InnerFacial NerveHumansModels, AnatomicRobotic Surgical ProceduresRound Window, EarScala TympaniSoftwareTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID32209514
PMCPMC7224420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.