Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32209452›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2020

How Early Life Adversity Influences Defensive Circuitry.

Sahana Murthy, Elizabeth Gould

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Depressive symptoms during the transition to adolescence: Left hippocampal volume as a marker of social context sensitivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sahana MurthyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Elizabeth GouldPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: goulde@Princeton.edu.
Princeton University · US

Funding

Investigating steroid hormones, neurosteroids, and perineuronal nets in early life adversity-induced changes in hippocampal functionR01MH117459 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Elizabeth Gould · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood maltreatment increases the likelihood of developing anxiety disorders in humans. Early life adversity (ELA) paradigms in rodents produce lasting increases in avoidant and inhibitory responses to both immediate and nonspecific threats, collectively referred to as defensive behaviors. This approach provides an opportunity to thoroughly investigate the underlying mechanisms, an effort that is currently under way. In this review, we consider the growing literature indicating that ELA alters the rhythmic firing of neurons in brain regions associated with defensive behavior, as well as potential neuronal, glial, and extracellular matrix contributions to functional changes in this circuitry. We also consider how ELA studies in rodents may inform us about both susceptible and resilient outcomes in humans.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesBrainAnimalsAnxiety DisordersHumansNeuronsResilience, Psychologicalamygdalaanxietyfearhippocampuspostnatal stressprefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID32209452
PMCPMC7980259
OpenAlexW3009739238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.