ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2020
Implementing and evaluating the efficacy of an acute care urology model of care in a large community hospital.
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CUAJ at 20.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
- A systematic review of dedicated models of care for emergency urological patients.Asian journal of urology · 2021Review
- Don't call it a job market.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021Article
- *To self* Don't write a COVID editorial. Do not write another COVID editorial.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020Article
- Acute care for renal colic in Canadian healthcare - a commentary on emergency department patient flow metrics and treatment options.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe implemented an acute care urology (ACU) model at a large Canadian community hospital to determine the impacts on safe and timely care of patients with renal colic. The model includes a dedicated ACU surgeon, a clinic for emergency department (ED) referrals, and additional daytime operating room (OR) blocks for urgent cases.
methodsWe conducted a chart review of 579 patients presenting to the ED with renal colic. Data was collected before (pre-intervention, September to November 2015) and after (post-intervention, September to November 2016) implementation of the ACU model. Secondary methods of evaluation included surveying patients and 20 ED physicians to capture subjective feedback.
resultsOf the 579 patients presenting with renal colic,194 were diagnosed with an obstructing kidney stone and were referred to urology for outpatient care. The ED-to-clinic time was significantly lower for those in the ACU model (p<0.001). Furthermore, the ACU clinic resulted in significantly more patients being referred for outpatient care (p=0.0004). There was also higher likelihood that patients would successfully obtain an appointment post-referral (p=0.0242). The number of after-hours and weekend surgeries decreased significantly after dedicated ACU daytime OR blocks were added in September 2015 (p<0.0001). All surveyed patients rated the care as either "excellent" or "very good," and all physicians believed the ACU model has improved patient care.
conclusionsThe ACU model has shown benefit in ensuring timely followup for ED patients, reducing use of after-hour OR time, and improving patient and physician satisfaction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.