Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32209118›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2020

Using the spike protein feature to predict infection risk and monitor the evolutionary dynamic of coronavirus.

Xiao-Li Qiang, Peng Xu, Gang Fang, Wen-Bin Liu, Zheng Kou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Classifying COVID-19 based on amino acids encoding with machine learning algorithms.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiao-Li QiangInstitute of Computing Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Peng XuInstitute of Computing Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Gang FangInstitute of Computing Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Wen-Bin LiuInstitute of Computing Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Zheng KouInstitute of Computing Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. kouzhengcn@foxmail.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61972109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus can cross the species barrier and infect humans with a severe respiratory syndrome. SARS-CoV-2 with potential origin of bat is still circulating in China. In this study, a prediction model is proposed to evaluate the infection risk of non-human-origin coronavirus for early warning.

methodsThe spike protein sequences of 2666 coronaviruses were collected from 2019 Novel Coronavirus Resource (2019nCoVR) Database of China National Genomics Data Center on Jan 29, 2020. A total of 507 human-origin viruses were regarded as positive samples, whereas 2159 non-human-origin viruses were regarded as negative. To capture the key information of the spike protein, three feature encoding algorithms (amino acid composition, AAC; parallel correlation-based pseudo-amino-acid composition, PC-PseAAC and G-gap dipeptide composition, GGAP) were used to train 41 random forest models. The optimal feature with the best performance was identified by the multidimensional scaling method, which was used to explore the pattern of human coronavirus.

resultsThe 10-fold cross-validation results showed that well performance was achieved with the use of the GGAP (g = 3) feature. The predictive model achieved the maximum ACC of 98.18% coupled with the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.9638. Seven clusters for human coronaviruses (229E, NL63, OC43, HKU1, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) were found. The cluster for SARS-CoV-2 was very close to that for SARS-CoV, which suggests that both of viruses have the same human receptor (angiotensin converting enzyme II). The big gap in the distance curve suggests that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is not clear and further surveillance in the field should be made continuously. The smooth distance curve for SARS-CoV suggests that its close relatives still exist in nature and public health is challenged as usual.

conclusionsThe optimal feature (GGAP, g = 3) performed well in terms of predicting infection risk and could be used to explore the evolutionary dynamic in a simple, fast and large-scale manner. The study may be beneficial for the surveillance of the genome mutation of coronavirus in the field.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAlgorithmsAmino AcidsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsBetacoronavirusChinaChlorocebus aethiopsCoronavirusCOVID-19Disease ReservoirsEndopeptidasesGenomeGenome, ViralACE2 protein, humanAmino AcidsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2angiotensin-producing serum enzyme IIEndopeptidasesPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2CoronavirusCross-species infectionMachine learningSpike protein

Identifiers

PMID32209118
PMCPMC7093988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.