Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32209082›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2020

Addressing microaggressions in racially charged patient-provider interactions: a pilot randomized trial.

Jonathan W Kanter, Daniel C Rosen, Katherine E Manbeck, Heather M L Branstetter, Adam M Kuczynski, Mariah D Corey, Daniel W M Maitland, Monnica T Williams

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Designing Communication Feedback Systems To Reduce Healthcare Providers' Implicit Biases In Patient Encounters.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  18. ConverSense: An Automated Approach to Assess Patient-Provider Interactions using Social Signals.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan W KanterUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA. jonkan@uw.edu.
Daniel C RosenBastyr University, Kenmore, USA.
Katherine E ManbeckUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Heather M L BranstetterBastyr University, Kenmore, USA.
Adam M KuczynskiUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Mariah D CoreyUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Daniel W M MaitlandTexas A&M University Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, USA.
Monnica T WilliamsUniversity of Connecticut, Mansfield, USA.
University of Washington · USBastyr University · USSeattle University · USTexas A&M University – Corpus Christi · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacial bias in medical care is a significant public health issue, with increased focus on microaggressions and the quality of patient-provider interactions. Innovations in training interventions are needed to decrease microaggressions and improve provider communication and rapport with patients of color during medical encounters.

methodsThis paper presents a pilot randomized trial of an innovative clinical workshop that employed a theoretical model from social and contextual behavioral sciences. The intervention specifically aimed to decrease providers' likelihood of expressing biases and negative stereotypes when interacting with patients of color in racially charged moments, such as when patients discuss past incidents of discrimination. Workshop exercises were informed by research on the importance of mindfulness and interracial contact involving reciprocal exchanges of vulnerability and responsiveness. Twenty-five medical student and recent graduate participants were randomized to a workshop intervention or no intervention. Outcomes were measured via provider self-report and observed changes in targeted provider behaviors. Specifically, two independent, blind teams of coders assessed provider emotional rapport and responsiveness during simulated interracial patient encounters with standardized Black patients who presented specific racial challenges to participants.

resultsGreater improvements in observed emotional rapport and responsiveness (indexing fewer microaggressions), improved self-reported explicit attitudes toward minoritized groups, and improved self-reported working alliance and closeness with the Black standardized patients were observed and reported by intervention participants.

conclusionsMedical providers may be more likely to exhibit bias with patients of color in specific racially charged moments during medical encounters. This small-sample pilot study suggests that interventions that directly intervene to help providers improve responding in these moments by incorporating mindfulness and interracial contact may be beneficial in reducing racial health disparities.

Indexed as

AggressionProfessional-Patient RelationsRacismAdultFemaleHumansMaleObservationPilot ProjectsSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID32209082
PMCPMC7092438
OpenAlexW3013501906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.