ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2020
Combining
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- In silico modeling of anterior foregut endoderm differentiation towards lung epithelial progenitors.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- In silico model development and optimization of in vitro lung cell population growth.PloS one · 2024Article
- Mathematical modelling with Bayesian inference to quantitatively characterize therapeutic cell behaviour in nerve tissue engineering.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Perspectives on optimizing local delivery of drugs to peripheral nerves using mathematical models.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2023Review
- Hydrogel-based 3D human iPSC-derived neuronal culture for the study of rabies virus infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- A combined experimental and computational framework to evaluate the behavior of therapeutic cells for peripheral nerve regeneration.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2022Article
- Article
- 'EngNT' - Engineering live neural tissue for nerve replacement.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2021Article
- Modelling-informed cell-seeded nerve repair construct designs for treating peripheral nerve injuries.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Regenerative medicine meets mathematical modelling: developing symbiotic relationships.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The seeding density of therapeutic cells in engineered tissue impacts both cell survival and vascularization. Excessively high seeded cell densities can result in increased death and thus waste of valuable cells, whereas lower seeded cell densities may not provide sufficient support for the tissue
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.