ArticleClinical cardiology2020
Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding atrial fibrillation among neurologists in central China: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caregivers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Risk Factors and Management of Post-Stroke Delirium Among Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Oral Anticoagulant Therapy of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiology, Internal Medicine, and Surgery: Temporal Trend.MedComm · 2025Article
- Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding stone formation and recurrence among urolithiasis patients: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among osteoarthritis patients: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of atrial fibrillation in high altitude areas.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Knowledge, attitude and practice toward oral anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- An instrument to measure atrial fibrillation knowledge in Chinese patients: validation of the Jessa Atrial fibrillation Knowledge Questionnaire.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding atrial fibrillation among neurologists in central China: A cross-sectional study.Clinical cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysicians' knowledge and practice of atrial fibrillation (AF) are determinants of the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis. HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to investigate physicians' knowledge, attitude, and practice toward AF, to analyze the influencing factors, and to provide data to support departments that develop health policies.
methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out from October 1, 2016, to March 31, 2018. A standard-structured anonymous questionnaire was completed by each participant through face-to-face interviews.
resultsA total of 611 doctors from 38 hospitals were responded to this survey. The mean of the total score of the questionnaire was 21.59 ± 3.559 (total score of the questionnaire was 36), and the mean scores of knowledge, attitude, and practice were 6.86 ± 1.70, 6.13 ± 1.35, and 8.59 ± 2.21, respectively. The doctor' s knowledge, practice scores, and total scores were positively correlated with the education level and the workplace. The influencing factors that affect doctors' knowledge, attitudes, and practice scores including education level, professional title, working years, hospital grade, and hospital location.
conclusionsThere was still a big gap in neurologists' knowledge and practice about AF. It is necessary to strengthen the continuous improvement of doctor training to improve the management of AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.