ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2020
Incorporating Sex as a Biological Variable into Clinical and Translational Research Training.
Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and solutions in women's health research and clinical care: a call to action.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Review
- Women in Dental Clinical and Translational Research.Advances in dental research · 2024Article
- Gender as a social and structural variable: research perspectives from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- A review of the genomics of neonatal abstinence syndrome.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Biomedical Researchers' Perceptions of the NIH's Sex as a Biological Variable Policy for Animal Research: Results from a U.S. National Survey.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021Article
- Evaluating the National Institutes of Health's Sex as a Biological Variable Policy: Conflicting Accounts from the Front Lines of Animal Research.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Incorporating sex as a biological variable (SABV) into basic and medical research requires a deliberate plan that weaves concepts of basic genetics, cellular and molecular physiology, and pharmacology into translational medicine. An R4 approach (Right content to the Right learner at the Right time with the Right modality) allows for content to be available in a variety of formats that reinforces the concepts at staged levels of integration. Weaving SABV throughout the varied formats of the R4 approach within the Clinical and Translational Research Training Programs, into the mentoring and training of scholars in NIH Building Interdisciplinary Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH), and into the Career Enhancement Core of the Specialized Centers of Research Excellence (SCORE) on sex differences through curriculum, case-based approach and journal clubs, and workshops ensures that learners grasp its fundamental relevancy to their own research and beyond. In addition, the collaborative work among the BIRCWH and SCORE programs brings collective expertise from centers around the United States to individual programs through development of best practices and materials. These collective efforts assure that the next generation of basic, clinical, and translational scientists will bring the dimension of SABV into their research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.