Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32207947›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2020

Flexible Fitting of Small Molecules into Electron Microscopy Maps Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Neural Network Potentials.

John W Vant, Shae-Lynn J Lahey, Kalyanashis Jana, Mrinal Shekhar, Daipayan Sarkar, Barbara H Munk, Ulrich Kleinekathöfer, Sumit Mittal, Christopher Rowley, Abhishek Singharoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Faces of Contemporary CryoEM Information and Modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John W VantSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States.
Shae-Lynn J LaheyDepartment of Chemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1C 5S7, Canada.
Kalyanashis JanaDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, Jacobs University Bremen, 28759 Bremen, Germany.
Mrinal ShekharSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States.
Daipayan SarkarSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States.
Barbara H MunkSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States.
Ulrich KleinekathöferDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, Jacobs University Bremen, 28759 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6114-7431
Sumit MittalSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States.
Christopher RowleyDepartment of Chemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1C 5S7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0205-952X
Abhishek SingharoySchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9000-2397

Funding

WHOLE CELL SIMULATIONP41GM104601 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI TAJKHORSHID, EMAD · 2012 to 2021
$19.0M
Commodity Hardware Acceleration of Popular Modeling Software for Structural BioloR01GM098243 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SCHULTEN, KLAUS · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM104601NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant advances in resolution, the potential for cryo-electron microscopy (EM) to be used in determining the structures of protein-drug complexes remains unrealized. Determination of accurate structures and coordination of bound ligands necessitates simultaneous fitting of the models into the density envelopes, exhaustive sampling of the ligand geometries, and, most importantly, concomitant rearrangements in the side chains to optimize the binding energy changes. In this article, we present a flexible-fitting pipeline where molecular dynamics flexible fitting (MDFF) is used to refine structures of protein-ligand complexes from 3 to 5 Å electron density data. Enhanced sampling is employed to explore the binding pocket rearrangements. To provide a model that can accurately describe the conformational dynamics of the chemically diverse set of small-molecule drugs inside MDFF, we use QM/MM and neural-network potential (NNP)/MM models of protein-ligand complexes, where the ligand is represented using the QM or NNP model, and the protein is represented using established molecular mechanical force fields (e.g., CHARMM). This pipeline offers structures commensurate to or better than recently submitted high-resolution cryo-EM or X-ray models, even when given medium to low-resolution data as input. The use of the NNPs makes the algorithm more robust to the choice of search models, offering a radius of convergence of 6.5 Å for ligand structure determination. The quality of the predicted structures was also judged by density functional theory calculations of ligand strain energy. This strain potential energy is found to systematically decrease with better fitting to density and improved ligand coordination, indicating correct binding interactions. A computationally inexpensive protocol for computing strain energy is reported as part of the model analysis protocol that monitors both the ligand fit as well as model quality.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationNeural Networks, ComputerCryoelectron MicroscopyMicroscopy, ElectronMolecular ConformationProtein Conformation

Identifiers

PMID32207947
PMCPMC7311632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.