Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32207797›Full record

ArticleJAMA2020

Diagnostic Yield of Newborn Screening for Biliary Atresia Using Direct or Conjugated Bilirubin Measurements.

Sanjiv Harpavat, Joseph A Garcia-Prats, Carlos Anaya, Mary L Brandt, Philip J Lupo, Milton J Finegold, Alice Obuobi, Adel A ElHennawy, William S Jarriel, Benjamin L Shneider

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sanjiv HarpavatDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
Joseph A Garcia-PratsDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
Carlos AnayaUniversity of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine and Doctors Hospital at Renaissance, Edinburg.
Mary L BrandtDepartment of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
Philip J LupoDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
Milton J FinegoldDepartment of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Alice ObuobiDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
Adel A ElHennawyDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
William S JarrielWoman's Hospital of Texas, Houston.
Benjamin L ShneiderDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
Baylor College of Medicine · USTexas Children's Hospital · USDoctors Hospital · USWoman’s Hospital of Texas · US

Funding

Assessment of a Novel Newborn Screening Tool for Biliary AtresiaK23DK109207 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI HARPAVAT, SANJIV · 2017 to 2021
$901k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK109207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Treating biliary atresia in newborns earlier can delay or prevent the need for liver transplant; however, treatment typically occurs later because biliary atresia is difficult to detect during its early stages. Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield of newborn screening for biliary atresia with direct or conjugated bilirubin measurements and to evaluate the association of screening implementation with clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional screening study of 124 385 infants born at 14 Texas hospitals between January 2015 and June 2018; and a pre-post study of 43 infants who underwent the Kasai portoenterostomy as treatment for biliary atresia at the region's largest pediatric hepatology center before (January 2008-June 2011) or after (January 2015-June 2018) screening implementation. Final follow-up occurred on July 15, 2019. Exposures: Two-stage screening with direct or conjugated bilirubin measurements. In stage 1, all newborns were tested within the first 60 hours of life, with a positive screening result defined as bilirubin levels exceeding derived 95th percentile reference intervals. In stage 2, infants who had a positive screening result in stage 1 were retested at or before the 2-week well-child visit, with a positive screening result defined as bilirubin levels greater than the stage 1 result or greater than 1 mg/dL. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes of the screening study were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value based on infants testing positive in both stages. The reference standard was biliary atresia diagnosed at the region's pediatric hepatology centers. The primary outcome of the pre-post study was the age infants underwent the Kasai portoenterostomy for treatment of biliary atresia. Results: Of 124 385 newborns in the screening study, 49.2% were female, 87.6% were of term gestational age, 70.0% were white, and 48.1% were Hispanic. Screening identified the 7 known infants with biliary atresia with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 56.1%-100.0%), a specificity of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9%-99.9%), a positive predictive value of 5.9% (95% CI, 2.6%-12.2%), and a negative predictive value of 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0%-100.0%). In the pre-post study, 24 infants were treated before screening implementation and 19 infants were treated after screening implementation (including 6 of 7 from the screening study, 7 from screening at nonstudy hospitals, and 6 from referrals because of clinical symptoms). The age infants underwent the Kasai portoenterostomy was significantly younger after screening was implemented (mean age, 56 days [SD, 19 days] before screening implementation vs 36 days [SD, 22 days] after screening implementation; between-group difference, 19 days [95% CI, 7-32 days]; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance: Newborn screening with direct or conjugated bilirubin measurements detected all known infants with biliary atresia in the study population, although the 95% CI around the sensitivity estimate was wide and the study design did not ensure complete ascertainment of false-negative results. Research is needed in larger populations to obtain more precise estimates of diagnostic yield and to better understand the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this screening approach.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBiliary AtresiaBilirubinCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLiver TransplantationMaleNeonatal ScreeningPortoenterostomy, HepaticPredictive Value of TestsReference ValuesSensitivity and SpecificityTime-to-TreatmentBilirubin

Identifiers

PMID32207797
PMCPMC7093763
OpenAlexW3012795198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.