ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Hackathons as Stepping Stones in Health Care Innovation: Case Study With Systematic Recommendations.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building the future of patient-centred research: an EULAR PARE community of practice advancing patient research partner involvement in rheumatology.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Clinician Participation in Innovation Labs at University Hospitals: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Co-Creation of Mental Health Intervention for Adolescents: A Social Hackathon Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Co-Designing Peer Support Interventions for Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Caregivers: A Novel Integration of Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centred Design Thinking.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2026Article
- The Patient Monitoring Roundtable as Catalyst for Health Care Innovation: Case Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Public Health Hackathon: empowering high school students as tomorrow's leaders and innovators in public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Enhancing Parenting Using AI: Exploratory Hackathon.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Bridging generative AI and healthcare practice: insights from the GenAI Health Hackathon at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Unlocking opportunities to transform patient care: an expert insight on limitations and opportunities in patient monitoring.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
- Designathons in health research: a global systematic review.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- An innovation bootcamp model for developing youth-led HIV self-testing delivery strategies in Nigeria: post-designathon capacity building.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Teaching Principles of Medical Innovation and Entrepreneurship Through Hackathons: Case Study and Qualitative Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2023Article
- Implementing the Bashayer chatbot in Saudi higher education: measuring the influence on students' motivation and learning strategies.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A hackathon as a tool to enhance research and practice on electronic health record systems' interoperability for chronic disease management and prevention.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Crowdsourcing to support training for public health: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- PHINDaccess Hackathons for COVID-19 and Host-Pathogen Interaction: Lessons Learned and Recommendations for Low- and Middle-Income Countries.BioMed research international · 2023Article
- Boundary Objects as Dialogical Learning Accelerators for Social Change in Design for Health: Systematic Review.JMIR human factors · 2022Review
- Rapid crowdsourced innovation for COVID-19 response and economic growth.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Article
- Interdisciplinary Online Hackathons as an Approach to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Improvements in Patient Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit: Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUntil recently, developing health technologies was time-consuming and expensive, and often involved patients, doctors, and other health care professionals only as passive recipients of the end product. So far, users have been minimally involved in the ideation and creation stages of digital health technologies. In order to best address users' unmet needs, a transdisciplinary and user-led approach, involving cocreation and direct user feedback, is required. In this context, hackathon events have become increasingly popular in generating enthusiasm for user-centered innovation.
objectiveThis case study describes preparatory steps and the performance of a health hackathon directly involving patients and health care professionals at all stages. Feasibility and outcomes were assessed, leading to the development of systematic recommendations for future hackathons as a vehicle for bottom-up innovation in health care.
methodsA 2-day hackathon was conducted in February 2017 in Berlin, Germany. Data were collected through a field study. Collected field notes were subsequently discussed in 15 informal meetings among the research team. Experiences of conducting two further hackathons in December 2017 and November 2018 were included.
resultsIn total, 30 participants took part, with 63% (19/30) of participants between 25 and 34 years of age, 30% (9/30) between 35 and 44 years of age, and 7% (2/30) younger than 25 years of age. A total of 43% (13/30) of the participants were female. The participation rate of medical experts, including patients and health care professionals, was 30% (9/30). Five multidisciplinary teams were formed and each tackled a specific health care problem. All presented projects were apps: a chatbot for skin cancer recognition, an augmented reality exposure-based therapy (eg, for arachnophobia), an app for medical neighborhood connectivity, a doctor appointment platform, and a self-care app for people suffering from depression. Patients and health care professionals initiated all of the projects. Conducting the hackathon resulted in significant growth of the digital health community of Berlin and was followed up by larger hackathons. Systematic recommendations for conducting cost-efficient hackathons (n≤30) were developed, including aspects of community building, stakeholder engagement, mentoring, themes, announcements, follow-up, and timing for each step.
conclusionsThis study shows that hackathons are effective in bringing innovation to health care and are more cost- and time-efficient and potentially more sustainable than traditional medical device and digital product development. Our systematic recommendations can be useful to other individuals and organizations that want to establish user-led innovation in academic hospitals by conducting transdisciplinary hackathons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.