Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32207587›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University2020

Geriatric assessment among elderly patients undergoing urological surgery: A systematic literature review.

Cyprian Michalik, Kajetan Juszczak, Piotr Maciukiewicz, Tomasz Drewa, Jakub Kenig

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Item analysis of G8 screening in uro-oncologic geriatric patients.International urology and nephrology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cyprian MichalikDepartment of Urology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Specialized Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Kajetan JuszczakDepartment of Urology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Specialized Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Piotr MaciukiewiczDepartment of Urology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Specialized Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Tomasz DrewaDepartment of General and Oncologic Urology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Jakub KenigDepartment of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLJagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elderly constitute the group of patients who most often undergo elective urological procedures, and they are at the highest risk of poor surgical outcomes because of comorbidity and frailty. The current model of qualification for surgery is often subjective and based on tools which do not address the characteristics of the elderly. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and screening tools can help in the evaluation of older, particularly frail patients. The aim of the study was to review the literature on the usefulness of preoperative geriatric evaluation in patients undergoing urological treatment. The review was based on MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library bibliographic databases from 2000-2017 for full-text, English-language publications meeting pre-defined criteria. Six prospective and 3 retrospective studies were selected for further analysis. The patient populations, methods of geriatric assessment, interventions, and outcome measures varied between the studies. None of the studies were randomized controlled trials. In 2 studies, the CGA was used; in other studies, rather basic screening tests were used. In only 2 studies, an intervention was performed after the CGA. In general, the variables of the CGA were both prospectively and retrospectively significant predictors of complications of urological surgery. Although the use of CGA is not a standard practice in everyday urological clinical practice, components of the CGA appear to be predictive of postoperative complications. Therefore, inclusion of geriatric assessment as part of routine preoperative care in geriatric urology patients should be considered. Because of the lack of randomized controlled trials on preoperative CGAs in urology patients, further studies are needed.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentPostoperative ComplicationsUrologic Surgical ProceduresAgedHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective Studieselderlyfrailtygeriatric assessmentpreoperative assessmenturological surgery

Identifiers

PMID32207587
OpenAlexW3012876318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.