Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32207577›Full record

ArticleBJS open2020

Nationwide in-hospital mortality rate following rectal resection for rectal cancer according to annual hospital volume in Germany.

J Diers, J Wagner, P Baum, S Lichthardt, C Kastner, N Matthes, H Matthes, C-T Germer, S Löb, A Wiegering

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Availability in ECMO Reduces the Failure to Rescue in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism After Major Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis of 2.4 Million Cases.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J DiersDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
J WagnerDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
P BaumDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
S LichthardtDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
C KastnerDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
N MatthesDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
H MatthesGemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, Berlin, Germany.
C-T GermerDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
S LöbDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
A WiegeringDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7777-0909
University of Würzburg · DEGemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of hospital volume after rectal cancer surgery is seldom investigated. This study aimed to analyse the impact of annual rectal cancer surgery cases per hospital on postoperative mortality and failure to rescue.

methodsAll patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and who had a rectal resection procedure code from 2012 to 2015 were identified from nationwide administrative hospital data. Hospitals were grouped into five quintiles according to caseload. The absolute number of patients, postoperative deaths and failure to rescue (defined as in-hospital mortality after a documented postoperative complication) for severe postoperative complications were determined.

resultsSome 64 349 patients were identified. The overall in-house mortality rate was 3·9 per cent. The crude in-hospital mortality rate ranged from 5·3 per cent in very low-volume hospitals to 2·6 per cent in very high-volume centres, with a distinct trend between volume categories (P < 0·001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis using hospital volume as random effect, very high-volume hospitals (53 interventions/year) had a risk-adjusted odds ratio of 0·58 (95 per cent c.i. 0·47 to 0·73), compared with the baseline in-house mortality rate in very low-volume hospitals (6 interventions per year) (P < 0·001). The overall postoperative complication rate was comparable between different volume quintiles, but failure to rescue decreased significantly with increasing caseload (15·6 per cent after pulmonary embolism in the highest volume quintile versus 38 per cent in the lowest quintile; P = 0·010).

conclusionPatients who had rectal cancer surgery in high-volume hospitals showed better outcomes and reduced failure to rescue rates for severe complications than those treated in low-volume hospitals.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleGermanyHospital MortalityHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRectal NeoplasmsRegistriesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32207577
PMCPMC7093786
OpenAlexW2999285116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.