Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32207564›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2020

Variation in the microbiota across different developmental stages of Aedes albopictus is affected by ampicillin exposure.

Wan Qing, Xue Zhijing, Yu Guangfu, Meng Fengxia, Liu Qiyong, Zhang Zhong, Zhang Ruiling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bacterial community composition and diversity associated with developmental stages of Anopheles subpictus.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Microbial gatekeepers: midgut bacteria inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring Changes in the Microbiota ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wan QingSchool of Basic Medical Science, Shandong First Medical University, Taian, China.
Xue ZhijingState Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Yu GuangfuSchool of Basic Medical Science, Shandong First Medical University, Taian, China.
Meng FengxiaState Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Liu QiyongState Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Zhang ZhongSchool of Basic Medical Science, Shandong First Medical University, Taian, China.
Zhang RuilingSchool of Basic Medical Science, Shandong First Medical University, Taian, China.
National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention · CNShandong First Medical University · CNTaishan Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiota plays an important role in the growth of mosquitoes and the transmission of mosquito-borne pathogens. The effects of changes in aquatic habitats in which mosquitoes live, as one of the major factors closely associated with the microbial communities of mosquitoes, on the microbiota of different developmental stages remain to be elucidated. Here, we compared the microbiota of larvae and pupae of Aedes albopictus exposed to different ampicillin concentrations and investigated the bacterial composition of adult females. The results demonstrate that the microbial community differed substantially between developmental stages and that samples of the same stages shared similarities, whereas differences were observed between adult females. Based on all observations, we hypothesize that the use of ampicillin caused dysbiosis rather than excluding bacteria from mosquitoes and that the disturbing effect of ampicillin was obvious in adults. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses revealed that most of the bacteria identified in this study were significantly associated with metabolism. Taken together, our results indicate that ampicillin can change the abundance of bacteria, while microbial communities of Ae. albopictus showed obvious stage-specific characteristics. Further investigations are needed to characterize specific bacterial components that are affected by ampicillin exposure and to quantify their functions, thereby providing a better understanding of the influence of antibiotics on microbial communities at different life stages.

Indexed as

AedesAmpicillinAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBiological Control AgentsDysbiosisLarvaMicrobiotaMosquito ControlPupaAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological Control Agents16S rRNA geneantibioticAsian tiger mosquitostage-specific

Identifiers

PMID32207564
PMCPMC7294303
OpenAlexW3012677999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.