Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32207542›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2020

Action at a Distance: Geriatric Research during a Pandemic.

Ginger E Nicol, Jay F Piccirillo, Benoit H Mulsant, Eric J Lenze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Recruiting for a Randomized Clinical Trial for Late-Life Depression During COVID-19: Outcomes of Provider Referrals Versus Facebook Self-Referrals.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ginger E NicolDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jay F PiccirilloDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Benoit H MulsantCentre for Addiction and Mental Health and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eric J LenzeDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
3/5 Neurocognitive and neuroimaging biomarkers: predicting progression towards dementia in patients with treatment resistant late-life depressionR01MH114969 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BUTTERS, MERYL A · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
1/5 Neurocognitive and neuroimaging biomarkers: predicting progression towards dementia in patients with treatment-resistant late-life depressionR01MH114970 · NIMH · CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH · PI VOINESKOS, ARISTOTLE NICHOLAS · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114969NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background"Action at a distance" may be the new norm for clinical researchers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic that may require social distancing for the next 18 months. We must minimize face-to-face contact with vulnerable populations. But we must also persist, adapt, and help our older patients and study participants during the pandemic.

methodsClinical researchers have an obligation to help, and we can. Recommendations for clinical researchers working with older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.

resultsImplement technology now: Minimize face-to-face contact with participants by utilizing digital tools, such as shifting to electronic informed consent and digital HIPAA-compliant tools such as e-mailed surveys or telehealth assessments. Assess the psychological and social impact of COVID-19: How are participants coping? What health or social behaviors have changed? How are they keeping up with current events? What are they doing to stay connected to their families, friends, and communities? Are their healthcare needs being met? Current studies should be adapted immediately to these ends. Mobilize research platforms for patient needs: Leverage our relationships with participants and rapidly deploy novel clinical engagement techniques such as digital tools to intervene remotely and reduce the negative effects of social isolation on our participants. Equip research staff with tangible resources, and provide timely population-specific health information to support patients and healthcare providers.

conclusionsWe have an opportunity to make an impact on our older adult patients now as this pandemic continues to unfold. Above all, clinical researchers need to continue working, to help as many people as possible through the crisis. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:922-925, 2020.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchGeriatricsPandemicsAgedCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPneumonia, ViralSocial IsolationTelemedicineclinical researchmobile healthsocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID32207542
PMCPMC7228241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.