Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32207233›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

Molecular natural history of breast cancer: Leveraging transcriptomics to predict breast cancer progression and aggressiveness.

Daniel J Cook, Jonatan Kallus, Rebecka Jörnsten, Jens Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel J CookDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5534-8600
Jonatan KallusDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Rebecka JörnstenDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jens NielsenDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Chalmers University of Technology · SENovo Nordisk Foundation · DKWallenberg Wood Science Center · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCharacterizing breast cancer progression and aggressiveness relies on categorical descriptions of tumor stage and grade. Interpreting these categorical descriptions is challenging because stage convolutes the size and spread of the tumor and no consensus exists to define high/low grade tumors.

methodsWe address this challenge of heterogeneity in patient-specific cancer samples by adapting and applying several tools originally created for understanding heterogeneity and phenotype development in single cells (specifically, single-cell topological data analysis and Wanderlust) to create a continuous metric describing breast cancer progression using bulk RNA-seq samples from individual patient tumors. We also created a linear regression-based method to predict tumor aggressiveness in vivo from bulk RNA-seq data.

resultsWe found that breast cancer proceeds along three convergent phenotype trajectories: luminal, HER2-enriched, and basal-like. Furthermore, 31 296 genes (for luminal cancers), 17 827 genes (for HER2-enriched), and 18 505 genes (for basal-like) are dynamically differentially expressed during breast cancer progression. Across progression trajectories, our results show that expression of genes related to ADP-ribosylation decreased as tumors progressed (while PARP1 and PARP2 increased or remained stable), suggesting the potential for a differential response to PARP inhibitors based on cancer progression. Additionally, we developed a 132-gene expression regression equation to predict mitotic index and a 23-gene expression regression equation to predict growth rate from a single breast cancer biopsy.

conclusionOur results suggest that breast cancer dynamically changes during disease progression, and growth rate of the cancer cells is associated with distinct transcriptional profiles.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, GeneticDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMitotic IndexPhenotypePoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesPrognosisRNA-SeqTranscriptomePARP1 protein, humanPARP2 protein, humanPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerasesdisease dynamicspatient heterogeneityRNA-seqsystems medicine

Identifiers

PMID32207233
PMCPMC7221450
OpenAlexW3012633383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.