ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2020
3D Coaxial Bioprinting of Vasculature.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Modeling Meets 3D Bioprinting: Emerging Synergies in Cardiovascular Disease Modeling.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Coaxial 3D Bioprinting Process Research and Performance Tests on Vascular Scaffolds.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Synergistic coupling between 3D bioprinting and vascularization strategies.Biofabrication · 2023Review
- The promising rise of bioprinting in revolutionalizing medical science: Advances and possibilities.Regenerative therapy · 2021Review
- Prevascularized Micro-/Nano-Sized Spheroid/Bead Aggregates for Vascular Tissue Engineering.Nano-micro letters · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development of a suitable vascular network for an efficient mass exchange is crucial to generate three-dimensional (3D) viable and functional thick construct in tissue engineering. Different technologies have been reported for the fabrication of vasculature conduits, such as decellularized tissues and biomaterial-based blood vessels. Recently, bioprinting has also been considered as a promising method in vascular tissue engineering. In this work, human umbilical vein smooth muscle cells (HUVSMCs) were encapsulated in sodium alginate and printed in the form of vasculature conduits using a coaxial nozzle deposition system. Protocols for cell encapsulation and 3D bioprinting are presented. Investigations including dehydration, swelling, degradation characteristics, and patency, permeability, and mechanical properties were also performed and presented to the reader. In addition, in vitro studies such as cell viability and evaluation of extra cellular matrix deposition were performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32207112What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.