Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32207107›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2020

Stereolithography 3D Bioprinting.

Hitendra Kumar, Keekyoung Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
34.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Thiolated Polymers in 3D Bioprinting: Control of Gelation.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Nano-Based 3D Printed Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Engineering in vitro vascular microsystems.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025
    Review
  12. Guidance on biomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration: Fabrication methods, materials and biological considerations.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Innovative Strategies in 3D Bioprinting for Spinal Cord Injury Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hitendra KumarSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Keekyoung KimSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada. keekyoung.kim@ucalgary.ca.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereolithography (SLA) 3D bioprinting has emerged as a prominent bioprinting method addressing the requirements of complex tissue fabrication. This chapter addresses the advancement in SLA 3D bioprinting in concurrent with the development of novel photocrosslinkable biomaterials with enhanced physical and chemical properties. We discuss the cytocompatible photoinitiators operating in the wide spectrum of the ultraviolet (UV) and the visible light and high-resolution dynamic mask projection systems with a suitable illumination source. The potential of SLA 3D bioprinting has been explored in various themes, like bone and neural tissue engineering and in the development of controlled microenvironments to study cell behavior. The flexible design and versatility of SLA bioprinting makes it an attractive bioprinting process with myriad possibilities and clinical applications.

Indexed as

BioprintingPrinting, Three-DimensionalStereolithographyBiocompatible MaterialsEquipment DesignGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansHydrogelsImaging, Three-DimensionalLightingMicrotechnologyPhotochemistryPolymerizationTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsHydrogel scaffoldsPhotocrosslinkingStereolithography 3D bioprintingTissue and organ regeneration

Identifiers

PMID32207107
OpenAlexW3013546250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.