Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206984›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2020

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of T1a renal cancer with externally cooled multitined expandable electrodes.

Massimo De Filippo, Francesco Ziglioli, Umberto Russo, Paolo Pagano, Luca Brunese, Elena Bertelli, Francesco Pagnini, Umberto Maestroni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Massimo De FilippoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiology, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, Parma, Italy. massimo.defilippo@unipr.it.
Francesco ZiglioliDepartment of Surgery, Unit of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, Parma, Italy.
Umberto RussoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiologic Sciences, University-Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, Parma, Italy.
Paolo PaganoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiologic Sciences, University-Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, Parma, Italy.
Luca BruneseDepartment of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, Via Francesco De Santis 86, Campobasso, Italy.
Elena BertelliDepartment of Radiology, University-Hospital of Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence, Italy.
Francesco PagniniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiology, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, Parma, Italy.
Umberto MaestroniDepartment of Surgery, Unit of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo retrospectively evaluate the mid-term outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with multitined expandable electrodes externally cooled with saline solution in patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, we evaluated 39 RCC in 35 patients treated with CT-guided RFA in 41 procedures (2011-2017). All patients were staged T1a, N0, M0 prior to RFA. Mean tumor size was 24.48 mm. A 4-tined expandable RFA electrode cooled with pump-circulating saline was used. Efficacy was evaluated verifying complete tumor necrosis (no contrast enhancement on imaging) at the end of the procedure and on subsequent controls. Follow-up observation period was 5 years. Minor/major complications, hospitalization days, serum creatinine and GFR pre- and post-RFA (compared using paired t test) and post-operative pain (evaluated with NRS after treatment) were considered as safety indicators. Overall survival was also calculated (Kaplan-Meier method).

resultsOf 35 patients, 30/35 had 1 treatment (primary effectiveness rate 86%), 4/35 had 2 treatments and 1/35 had 3 treatments for residual disease. There were no relapses and no mid-long-term complications; 3 minor (8%) and 1 major (2.7%) complications during perioperative period were reported. Mean before and after RFA serum creatinine rates were, respectively, 1.08 mg/dl and 1.11 mg/dl (p value: 0.4117). NRS median value is 0.8. Hospitalization days median value is [2.8 ± 1.9] days. 91.4% of all patients survived, with a median overall survival time of 65 months.

conclusionsMid-term results show that CT-guided RFA with multitined expandable electrodes externally cooled with saline solution is an effective and safe treatment in patients with RCC-staged T1aN0M0. Data reported in our study are in line with data reported in the literature from patients treated with other devices.

Indexed as

ElectrodesRadiography, InterventionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Renal CellCatheter AblationEquipment DesignFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPostoperative ComplicationsAblation techniquesInterventional radiologyMinimally invasive techniqueRenal cell carcinomaSmall renal masses

Identifiers

PMID32206984
OpenAlexW3012586036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.