Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206973›Full record

Observational studyClinical rheumatology2020

Sustained improvement in work outcomes in employed patients with rheumatoid arthritis during 2 years of adalimumab therapy: an observational cohort study.

Frank Behrens, Hans-Peter Tony, Michaela Koehm, Eva C Schwaneck, Holger Gnann, Gerd Greger, Harald Burkhardt, Marc Schmalzing

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01076205 (Long Term Documentation of the Safety and Efficacy as Well as the Effects on Quality of Life and Work Productivity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Under HUMIRA®), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01076205 completednot on this map

Long Term Documentation of the Safety and Efficacy as Well as the Effects on Quality of Life and Work Productivity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Under HUMIRA® (Adalimumab) in Routine Clinical Practice (AGIL)

TypeobservationalSponsorAbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)Ran2009 to 2017Enrolled7,229ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frank BehrensDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Hans-Peter TonySchwerpunkt Rheumatologie/Klinische Immunologie Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universität Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, Würzburg, Germany.
Michaela KoehmDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Eva C SchwaneckSchwerpunkt Rheumatologie/Klinische Immunologie Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universität Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, Würzburg, Germany.
Holger GnannAbteilung Biostatistik, GKM Gesellschaft für Therapieforschung mbH, Munich, Germany.
Gerd GregerAbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Harald BurkhardtDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marc SchmalzingSchwerpunkt Rheumatologie/Klinische Immunologie Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universität Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, Würzburg, Germany. Schmalzing_M@ukw.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3289-2299
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEAbbVie (Germany) · DE

Funding

AbbVie Deutschland None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term impact of adalimumab therapy on work-related outcomes in employed patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodWe utilized data from an observational cohort of German patients who initiated adalimumab treatment during routine clinical care. Analyses were based on employed patients (part-time or full-time) who continued adalimumab treatment for 24 months. Major outcomes were self-reported sick leave days in the previous 6 months, absenteeism, presenteeism, and total work productivity impairment as assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire and disease activity assessments. The normal number of sick leave days was based on data from the German Federal Statistical Office.

resultsOf 783 patients, 72.3% were women, mean age was 47.9 years, and mean disease duration was 7.8 years. At baseline (before adalimumab initiation), 42.9% of patients had higher than normal sick leave days (> 5) in the previous 6 months. During 24 months of adalimumab treatment, 61% of patients with higher than normal sick leave days at baseline returned to normal sick leave values (≤ 5 days/6 months). Overall, mean sick leave days/6 months decreased from 14.8 days at baseline to 7.4 days at month 24. Improvements were observed in WPAI assessments and disease activity measures, although presenteeism levels remained high (32.2% at month 24).

conclusionsAdalimumab treatment was associated with strong and sustained improvements in work-related outcomes in employed patients who continued on adalimumab for 24 months. Presenteeism appears to be the work outcome most resistant to improvement during RA treatment.

trial registrationNCT01076205 Key Points • Long-term adalimumab therapy was associated with sustained improvements in work outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. • Despite improvements in sick leave days and work absenteeism, presenteeism (impairment while at work) remained relatively high.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidAbsenteeismAdalimumabCohort StudiesEfficiencyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSick LeaveAdalimumabAbsenteeismAdalimumabPresenteeismRheumatoid arthritisTherapeutic effectsWork performance

Identifiers

PMID32206973
PMCPMC7426289
OpenAlexW3012937015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.