Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206939›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2020

Efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized and locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fahad Quhal, Keiichiro Mori, Reza Sari Motlagh, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Benjamin Pradere, Morgan Rouprêt, Andrea Necchi, Marco Moschini, Shahrokh F Shariat

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of different prediction tools for the risk of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. [Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Fahad QuhalDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Keiichiro MoriDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Reza Sari MotlaghDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ekaterina LaukhtinaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Benjamin PradereDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Morgan RouprêtSorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Andrea NecchiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Marco MoschiniDepartment of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · ATComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITKing Fahad Specialist Hospital · SALuzerner Kantonsspital · CHPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRSechenov University · RUUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the available literature regarding the oncologic effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with clinically non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and locally advanced UTUC. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases in November 2019, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included studies that compared patients with non-metastatic UTUC who received either neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with patients who underwent surgery alone. Subgroup meta-analyses were also performed for studies that investigated only locally advanced UTUC. Overall, 36 studies were included in the review of which 22 studies and 15,378 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was associated with higher rates of pathological downstaging (pDS) (RR 6.48, 95% CI 2.05-20.44, p = 0.001) and pathological complete response (RR 18.46, 95% CI 3.34-99.24, p = 0.001); and this was also proven in a subgroup analysis of studies that evaluated pDS in locally advanced UTUC (RR 3.18, 95% CI 2.0-5.07, p < 0.001). The association of NAC with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was also statistically significant in all patients and in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was associated with improved metastasis-free survival (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.76, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.77, p < 0.001), which continued to be true for the patients with locally advanced UTUC. The association of AC with OS was only significant in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Perioperative chemotherapy might provide better survival outcomes in patients with clinically non-metastatic UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to have promising results, although high level of evidence is still lacking. Despite the low level, the body of evidence suggests a need for multimodal therapy of invasive UTUC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNephroureterectomyTreatment OutcomeUrologic NeoplasmsAdjuvantChemotherapyNeoadjuvantNephroureterectomyUpper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32206939
OpenAlexW3012836167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.