Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206868›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Reduced cement volume does not affect screw stability in augmented pedicle screws.

Lukas Weiser, Kay Sellenschloh, Klaus Püschel, Michael M Morlock, Lennart Viezens, Wolfgang Lehmann, Gerd Huber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lukas WeiserDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany. Lukas.Weiser@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Kay SellenschlohInstitute of Biomechanics, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Klaus PüschelInstitute of Forensic Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael M MorlockInstitute of Biomechanics, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Lennart ViezensDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Wolfgang LehmannDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Gerd HuberInstitute of Biomechanics, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DEHamburg University of Technology · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCement augmentation of pedicle screws is able to improve screw anchorage in osteoporotic vertebrae but is associated with a high complication rate. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of different cement volumes on pedicle screw fatigue strength.

methodsTwenty-five human vertebral bodies (T12-L4) were collected from donors between 73 and 97 years of age. Bone density (BMD) was determined by quantitative computed tomography. Vertebral bodies were instrumented by conventional pedicle screws, and unilateral cement augmentation was performed. Thirteen vertebrae were augmented with a volume of 1 ml and twelve with a volume of 3 ml bone cement. A fatigue test was performed using a cranial-caudal sinusoidal, cyclic load (0.5 Hz) with increasing compression force (100 N + 0.1 N/cycles).

resultsThe load to failure was 183.8 N for the non-augmented screws and was increased significantly to 268.1 N (p < 0.001) by cement augmentation. Augmentation with 1 ml bone cement increased the fatigue load by 41% while augmentation with 3 ml increased the failure load by 51% compared to the non-augmented screws, but there was no significant difference in fatigue loads between the specimens with screws augmented with 1 ml and screws augmented with 3 ml of bone cement (p = 0.504).

conclusionCement augmentation significantly increases pedicle screw stability. The benefit of augmentation on screw anchorage was not significantly affected by reducing the applied volume of cement from 3 ml to 1 ml. Considering the high risk of cement leakage during augmentation, we recommend the usage of a reduced volume of 1 ml bone cement for each pedicle screw. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material .

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone CementsBone DensityHumansLumbar VertebraeTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone CementsBone mineral densityCAPSICement augmentationCement volumePedicle screw

Identifiers

PMID32206868
OpenAlexW3012681046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.