Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206692›Full record

ReviewVirusdisease2020

DNA viruses and cancer: insights from evolutionary biology.

Nitesh Vinodbhai Pandey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virusdisease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Gut eukaryotic virome in colorectal carcinogenesis: Is that a trigger?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nitesh Vinodbhai PandeyIndian Astrobiology Research Centre, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When it comes to understanding the exact mechanisms behind the virus induced cancers, we have often turned to molecular biology. It would be fair to argue that our understanding of cancers caused by viruses has significantly improved since the isolation of Epstein-Barr virus from Burkitt's lymphoma. However they are some important questions that remain unexplored like what advantage do viruses derive by inducing carcinogenesis? Why do viruses code for the so called oncogenes? Why DNA viruses are disproportionately linked to cancers? These questions have been addressed from the lens of evolutionary biology in this review. The evolutionary analysis of virus induced cancer suggests that persistent strategy of infection could be a stable strategy for DNA viruses and also the main culprit behind their tendency to cause cancer. The framework presented in the review not only explains wider observations about cancer caused by viruses but also offers fresh predictions to test the hypothesis.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisDNA virusesEvolutionary ecology of cancersEvolutionary medicineInfectious causes of cancerPersistent viral infections

Identifiers

PMID32206692
PMCPMC7085488
OpenAlexW3001984401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.