Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206673›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020

Does Early Functional Mobilization Affect Long-Term Outcomes After an Achilles Tendon Rupture? A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Susanna Aufwerber, Annette Heijne, Gunnar Edman, Karin Grävare Silbernagel, Paul W Ackermann

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02318472 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Direct Functional Mobilization After Achilles Tendon Rupture on Healing and Outcome

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2013 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsAchilles Tendon Rupture, Deep Venous ThrombosisArmsVACOped orthosis, Plaster cast
NCT06601088 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture - Intervention With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled220ConditionsAchilles Tendon Ruptures, Immobilization, Venous Thromboembolism (VTE), Muscle AtrophyArmsNeuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rehabilitation and Return to Sports after Achilles Tendon Repair.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Foot and Ankle Outcome Instruments: Missing the Target.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The heel-rise work test overestimates the performed work with 21-25% after an Achilles tendon rupture.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susanna AufwerberDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Annette HeijneDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gunnar EdmanDepartment of Research and Development, Norrtälje Hospital, Tiohundra, Norrtälje, Sweden.
Karin Grävare SilbernagelDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Paul W AckermannDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional deficits and health-related impairments are common after an Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). Rehabilitation protocols vary greatly, and few studies have allowed loading in combination with ankle motion immediately after surgery (ie, early functional mobilization [EFM]). It is unclear whether EFM may counteract the negative impact of ankle immobilization after an ATR. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of EFM compared with standard treatment (ie, 2 weeks of unloading in a plaster cast followed by 4 weeks of weightbearing in an orthosis) regarding patient-reported and functional outcomes in patients with an ATR after acute operative repair. The secondary aim was to explore whether the occurrence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) during the 2 postoperative treatments affected outcomes. STUDY

designRandomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

methodsA total of 135 patients who underwent ATR repair, randomized to either EFM, including immediate postoperative loading and ankle motion, or standard treatment, were evaluated with functional tests and 5 self-administered outcome questionnaires at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

resultsAt 6 months, the EFM group scored higher on the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36) questionnaire subscales of general health and vitality (

conclusionThis study demonstrated that an accelerated postoperative protocol with immediate loading and ankle motion resulted in better general health and vitality at 6 months. However, there were no differences between the groups in the recovery of heel-rise function. Future studies should focus on the means to reduce the risk of DVT to improve patient outcomes after ATR. REGISTRATION: NCT02318472 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Indexed as

Achilles tendonearly functional mobilizationheel-rise testpatient-reported outcome measuresrupturesurgical repair

Identifiers

PMID32206673
PMCPMC7076581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.