ArticleImaging science in dentistry2020
Does the metal artifact reduction algorithm activation mode influence the magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images?
Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Investigating the effectiveness of MAR algorithm on magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images: a systematic review.Oral radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of Artifact Expression in Zirconia and Graphene Crowns in CBCT Images From Different Systems.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Efficacy of a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in CBCT Images of Teeth With Ceramic Brackets With/Without Coated Archwires: An In Vitro Study.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Effect of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on cone-beam computed tomography scans of titanium and zirconia implants within and outside the field of view.Imaging science in dentistry · 2024Article
- Influence of tube current and metal artifact reduction on the diagnosis of external cervical resorption in teeth adjacent to a dental implant in CBCT: an ex-vivo study.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Impact of the spatial orientation of the patient's head, metal artifact reduction, and tube current on cone-beam computed tomography artifact expression adjacent to a dental implant: A laboratory study using a simulated surgical guide.Imaging science in dentistry · 2024Article
- Effect of metal artefact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2024Article
- Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Does the shape of the field-of-view influence the magnitude of artefacts from high-density materials in cone-beam computed tomography?Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Effect of cone-beam computed tomography metal artefact reduction on incomplete subtle vertical root fractures.Imaging science in dentistry · 2023Article
- The Effect of Changes in the Angular Position of Implants on Metal Artifact Reduction in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images: A Scoping Review.Radiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- The Impact of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Exposure Parameters on Peri-Implant Artifacts: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2022Review
- CBCT image artefacts generated by implants located inside the field of view or in the exomass.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2022Article
- Artefacts at different distances from titanium and zirconia implants in cone-beam computed tomography: effect of tube current and metal artefact reduction.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Article
- Accuracy of digital model generated from CT data with metal artifact reduction algorithm.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Influence of CBCT metal artifact reduction on vertical radicular fracture detection.Imaging science in dentistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm activated at different times during cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition on the magnitude of artifacts generated by a zirconium implant. MATERIALS AND
methodsVolumes were obtained with and without a zirconium implant in a human mandible, using the OP300 Maxio unit. Three modes were tested: without MAR, with MAR activated after acquisition, and with MAR activated before acquisition. Artifacts were assessed in terms of the standard deviation (SD) of gray values and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in 6 regions of interest with different distances (10 to 35 mm, from the nearest to the farthest) and angulations (70° to 135°) from the implant region.
resultsIn the acquisitions without MAR, the regions closer to the implant (10 and 15 mm) had a higher SD and lower CNR than the farther regions. When MAR was activated (before or after), SD values did not differ among the regions (
conclusionBoth modes of MAR activation were effective in decreasing the magnitude of CBCT artifacts, especially when the effects of the artifacts were more noticeable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.