Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206495›Full record

Review3 Biotech2020

Where is human-based cellular pharmaceutical R&D taking us in cartilage regeneration?

Damla Alkaya, Cansu Gurcan, Pelin Kilic, Acelya Yilmazer, Gunhan Gurman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Damla Alkaya1Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Cevizlidere Mah., Ceyhun Atuf Kansu Cd. No: 169, Balgat, 06520 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7638-4907
Cansu Gurcan1Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Cevizlidere Mah., Ceyhun Atuf Kansu Cd. No: 169, Balgat, 06520 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-7176
Pelin Kilic1Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Cevizlidere Mah., Ceyhun Atuf Kansu Cd. No: 169, Balgat, 06520 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4219-3069
Acelya Yilmazer1Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Cevizlidere Mah., Ceyhun Atuf Kansu Cd. No: 169, Balgat, 06520 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2712-7450
Gunhan Gurman1Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Cevizlidere Mah., Ceyhun Atuf Kansu Cd. No: 169, Balgat, 06520 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1263-8947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lately, cellular-based cartilage joint therapies have gradually gained more attention, which leads to next generation bioengineering approaches in the development of cell-based medicinal products for human use in cartilage repair. The greatest hurdles of chondrocyte-based cartilage bioengineering are: (i) preferring the cell source; (ii) differentiation and expansion processes; (iii) the time necessary for chondrocyte expansion pre-implantation; and (iv) fixing the chondrocyte count in accordance with the lesion surface area of the patient in question. The chondrocyte presents itself to be the focal starting material for research and development of bioengineered cartilage-based medicinal products which promise the regeneration and restoration of non-orthopedic cartilage joint defects. Even though chondrocytes seem to be the first choice, inevitable complications related to proliferation, dedifferentation and redifferentiation are probable. Detailed studies are a necessity to fully investigate detailed culturing conditions, the chondrogenic strains of well-defined phenotypes and evaluation of the methods to be used in biomaterial production. Despite a majority of the current methods which aid amelioration of joint functionality, they are insufficient in fully restoring the natural structure and composition of the joint cartilage. Hence current studies have trended towards gene therapy, mesenchymal stem cells and tissue engineering practices. There are many studies addressing the outcomes of chondrocytes in the clinical scene, and many vital biomaterials have been developed for structuring the bioengineered cartilage. This study aims to convey to the audience the practical significance of chondrocyte-based clinical applications.

Indexed as

Autologous chondrocyte implantationCartilage bioengineeringCartilage isolationChondrocyteChondrocyte characterizationChondrocyte isolation

Identifiers

PMID32206495
PMCPMC7060299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.