Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206333›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis: A multicentre prospective cohort analysis of the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative national clinical dataset for rehabilitation centres in England.

Lynne Turner-Stokes, Richard Harding, Peihan Yu, Mendwas Dzingina, Wei Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lynne Turner-StokesDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3302-9462
Richard HardingDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, UK.
Peihan YuDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-5193
Mendwas DzinginaDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, UK.
Wei GaoDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRehabilitation is effective for multiple sclerosis, but is it value for money?

objectivesTo evaluate functional outcomes, care needs and cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis (MS).

methodsA multicentre cohort study of prospectively collected clinical data from the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative national clinical database. Data included all adults with MS ( OUTCOME MEASURES: Dependency/care needs: Northwick Park Dependency Scale/Care Needs Assessment, Functional independence: UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM). Cost-efficiency. Patients were analysed in three dependency groups (High/Medium/Low).

resultsAll groups showed significant reduction in dependency between admission and discharge on all measures (paired

conclusionsSpecialist rehabilitation provided good value for money in patients with MS, yielding improved outcomes and substantial savings in ongoing care costs, especially in high-dependency patients.

Indexed as

cost-efficiencydependencymultiple sclerosisoutcome measurementRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32206333
PMCPMC7079310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.