Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206294›Full record

ReviewEvoDevo2020

The common house spider

Hiroki Oda, Yasuko Akiyama-Oda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EvoDevo, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Single-cell sequencing reveals potential novel insights into appendage-patterning and joint-development in a spider.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spider Eye Development Editing and Silk Fiber Engineering Using CRISPR-Cas.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The genome sequence of the spider,Wellcome open research · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hiroki Oda1Laboratory of Evolutionary Cell and Developmental Biology, JT Biohistory Research Hall, 1-1 Murasaki-cho, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-1125 Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4424-988X
Yasuko Akiyama-Oda1Laboratory of Evolutionary Cell and Developmental Biology, JT Biohistory Research Hall, 1-1 Murasaki-cho, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-1125 Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7984-5932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The common house spider

Indexed as

Animal evolutionArthropodsAxis formationCheliceratesDatabaseEmbryogenesisGenomeParasteatoda tepidariorumSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID32206294
PMCPMC7082966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.